Labour Unions Tear Into BOE Governor Bailey Over ‘Wage Restraint’ Comments
(Bloomberg) -- U.K. labor unions have slammed Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey after he called for workers to hold off on demanding big pay rises to help control inflation.
“Workers don't need lectures from the Governor of the Bank of England on exercising pay restraint,” Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said. “Why is it that every time there is a crisis, rich men ask ordinary people to pay for it?”
The pushback comes after Bailey, in a number of interviews about the BOE's interest-rate hike on Thursday, said workers needed to exercise restraint in pay negotiations to prevent a wage-inflation spiral. Bailey's pay tops 575,000 pounds ($780,000), about 18 times average earnings.
Gary Smith, the general secretary of the GMB trade union, said the comments were a “sick joke”.
“The nerve of Mr. Bailey is scarcely credible,” he said. “Telling the hard-working people who carried this country through the pandemic they don't deserve a pay rise is outrageous.”
The comments, also widely derided on social media, were particularly controversial as they come at a time when U.K. households are facing the biggest squeeze on real incomes in at least 30 years. While the BOE expects pay to rise by almost 5% this year, that will fall short of inflation, which is on track to hit 7.25%.
“Inflation has not been caused by workers,” Graham added. “Why should they be expected to pay for the failures of the energy market and the total shambles of Government policy?
Kate Bell, the head of economics at the Trades Union Congress, said real wages are already set to fall by 50 pounds a month this year, extrapolating from BOE forecasts.
Asking workers and employers to hold pay rises down “will make the squeeze on family budgets even tighter,” she said.
Bailey told BBC radio on Friday that “we are looking to see quite clear restraint in the bargaining process.” He warned that otherwise, inflation “will get out of control.”
| Read More: |
|---|
©2022 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.