Get App
Download App Scanner
Scan to Download
Advertisement

'Implied Wrongdoing': Why Bloomberg Was Slapped With $356,000 Defamation Penalty In Singapore

Court says the 2024 report, read as a whole, implied links between two ministers' property deals and questionable financial practices despite Bloomberg's defence.

'Implied Wrongdoing': Why Bloomberg Was Slapped With $356,000 Defamation Penalty In Singapore
Singapore court orders Bloomberg to pay $356,000 in ministers' defamation case.
(Photo: Wikimedia Commons)

A Singapore court has ordered Bloomberg News and one of its reporters to pay S$460,000 ($356,000) in damages after ruling that a 2024 article on luxury property transactions defamed two cabinet ministers.

According to the BBC, the case was brought by Coordinating Minister for National Security K Shanmugam and Manpower Minister Tan See Leng over Bloomberg's report, "Singapore Mansion Deals Are Increasingly Shrouded in Secrecy."

The article explored how some buyers of Singapore's ultra-luxury Good Class Bungalows used trusts and shell companies in property transactions, structures that can obscure ownership. It referenced Shanmugam's sale of a bungalow for S$88 million through a trust and Tan's purchase of a bungalow worth about S$27 million.

ALSO READ: OpenAI's Feud With xAI Carries On As Apple Secrets Fight Revs Up

Bloomberg argued during the trial that the ministers were cited solely as "newsworthy examples" of prominent property deals and that the report did not suggest they had engaged in any wrongdoing. The news organisation also said the story had undergone extensive fact-checking and that both ministers were approached for comment before publication.

The court disagreed, holding that the article, when read in its entirety, conveyed the impression that the ministers were connected to questionable practices because it also discussed secrecy and money laundering, the BBC reported.

The ministers argued that the report unfairly linked their lawful property transactions to allegations of opaque financial dealings. Shanmugam said the article was deliberately framed to imply he had been involved in "shady deals."

Days after the story was published in December 2024, Singapore's government directed Bloomberg to publish a correction notice under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA).

ALSO READ: SK Hynix Slides More Than 20% In Two Days As AI Trade Unravels

Bloomberg complied with the order while stating it was doing so "under threat of sanction" and maintained that it stood by its reporting.

The two ministers had also won a separate defamation case against the editor of independent news outlet The Online Citizen, whose commentary was based on Bloomberg's article.

Singapore's leaders have frequently used defamation lawsuits to challenge critics and media organisations, arguing that such legal action is necessary to safeguard their reputations. Critics, however, say the lawsuits risk discouraging political criticism and public debate.

Essential Business Intelligence, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice, Daily Fuel, Gold and Silver Prices and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.

Newsletters

Update Email
to get newsletters straight to your inbox
⚠️ Add your Email ID to receive Newsletters
Note: You will be signed up automatically after adding email

News for You

Set as Trusted Source
on Google Search
Add NDTV Profit As Google Preferred Source
Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com