CICC, China Investment Securities Said to Be in Merger Talks
(Bloomberg) -- Investment bank China International Capital Corp. and brokerage China Investment Securities Co., firms with 186 billion yuan ($28 billion) of assets last year, are in talks on a possible merger, people familiar with the matter said.
A transaction is not certain, and the structure of any deal is yet to be decided, the people said, asking not to be identified because the talks are private.
CICC's shares jumped on the news, trading as much as 3.7 percent higher in Hong Kong. Investors may be betting that a merger would help CICC's efforts to reinvent itself under Chief Executive Officer Bi Mingjian after slipping from top Chinese brokerage by revenue in 2005 to No. 23 a decade later.
Linking up could be “a good deal for CICC,” said Lucas Wang, a Hong Kong-based analyst at First Shanghai Securities Ltd. “CICC's strength has been with high net worth individuals and corporate clients; the network and mass-market client base of China Investment Securities will be a good fit.”
CICC's shares closed up 1.5 percent on Monday. Later, in a statement to the exchange, CICC said it was in “very preliminary” discussions with China Investment Securities on “strategic cooperation and business opportunities” and it wasn't certain that a transaction would proceed.
China's Goldman
Set up in 1995, Beijing-based CICC was part-owned by Morgan Stanley until that firm sold out in 2010. Run by Levin Zhu, the son of then-Premier Zhu Rongji, it brought some of the country's biggest state-owned firms to market, becoming known as China's answer to Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
As part of CICC's efforts to drive a revival, it raised $811 million from an initial public offering in Hong Kong in November, earmarking money for expansions in equity sales and trading, wealth management and international business. During last year, surging income from brokerage commissions and asset management helped to drive up profit.
The company that CICC may combine with, Shenzhen-based China Investment Securities, sat at No. 17 in the revenue rankings for last year, where Citic Securities Co. was No. 1, according to Securities Association of China data.
China Investment Securities is 100 percent owned by Central Huijin Investment Ltd., according to the brokerage's website. Huijin, a unit of China's sovereign wealth fund, owns 28.4 percent of CICC, according to CICC's website.
Huijin's Revamps
A deal would follow previous revamps of brokerages controlled by Huijin. Shenyin & Wanguo Securities Co. and Hong Yuan Securities Co. were combined in a $6.4 billion deal struck in 2014, creating one of the nation's biggest brokers, Shenwan Hongyuan Group Co. Another broker controlled by Huijin, China Galaxy Securities Co., was listed in 2013.
Here's how CICC and China Investment Securities compared in 2015, based on data from their websites and annual reports:
- Assets: CICC, 94.1 billion yuan; China Investment Securities, 92.2 billion yuan
- Full-year profit increase: CICC, 75 percent; China Investment Securities, 194 percent
- Net income: CICC, 1.95 billion yuan; China Investment Securities, 3.6 billion yuan
- Branches: CICC, 20; China Investment Securities, 160
There was no immediate response to an e-mail sent to the Beijing-based press office of Central Huijin's parent, China Investment Corp., and no one answered a call to China Investment Securities seeking comment.
--With assistance from Cathy Chan and Zhang Dingmin To contact Bloomberg News staff for this story: Steven Yang in Beijing at kyang74@bloomberg.net, Jun Luo in Shanghai at jluo6@bloomberg.net. To contact the editors responsible for this story: Marcus Wright at mwright115@bloomberg.net, Paul Panckhurst, Russell Ward
With assistance from Jun Luo, Steven Yang
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets
-
India Is Going Abroad For Critical Minerals. But It May Take Years To Pay Off | The Reason Why
Although India's steps are in the right direction, they remain modest compared with India's growing dependence.
-
When Everyone Has AI, What Gives You An Edge?
India's young workforce is entering an uncertain world of work where powerful AI tools are becoming widely accessible. The advantage will belong to those who combine deep expertise with digital fluency, and the distinctly human capabilities that technology cannot manufacture.