Get App
Download App Scanner
Scan to Download
Advertisement

Rs 4.81 Lakh Income, Rs 50 Lakh In Policy: Why ITAT Rejected This Woman’s Claim

The Assessing Officer saw the investment as out of line with her income and reopened the case under Section 147.

Rs 4.81 Lakh Income, Rs 50 Lakh In Policy: Why ITAT Rejected This Woman’s Claim
Image: Unslpash

A woman's claim of investing Rs 50 lakh in a life insurance policy with only a declared annual income of Rs 4,81,340 has been rejected by tax authorities. 

For the Assessment Year 2009-10, Pratibha Singh informed the authorities that she had earned Rs 4,81,340. The LIC, though, told the tax department that she had invested Rs 50 lakh in a life insurance policy during that year. 

The Assessing Officer saw the investment as out of line with her income and reopened the case under Section 147. 

Also Read | Layoffs Are Rising In Tech, But These Skills Are Helping People Unlock Better Pay

On 25 February 2026, the Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled on this anomaly and upheld the Rs 50 lakh addition as unexplained investment.

ALSO READ: Investing In US Stocks Through Zerodha? Charges, Tax Rules And LRS Limits Explained

Pratibha Singh's Defence

Pratibha claimed that the money belonged to a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), not to her. The claim was that the HUF's orchard agri income had been routed through an LIC agent, Anand Chauhan, under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). She said she was merely a member of the HUF, so the tax should not be levied on her. 

The ITAT bench found her argument weak on various grounds. First, the timeline of when the MOU was issued didn't match with the date when it was presented to the assessing officer. The assessing officer also confirmed that no original copy of the MOU was ever presented to him.The bench noted that a policy needs a personal declaration and a medical examination, which an individual does not an HUF. It was her life being insured by the policy.

Pratibha appealed  for the addition to be treated as “protective”. The tribunal rejected this on legal grounds. A protective assessment is a tool for the taxman when he is unsure who owns the income.

ALSO READ: India Needs to Repudiate Retrospective Tax Laws: Fund manager

This tool cannot be demanded as a saving measure.

The tribunal said each assessment year stands alone. It added that double taxation arises only when the same income is finally taxed in two hands, and the HUF proceedings had not reached finality.

Essential Business Intelligence, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice, Daily Fuel, Gold and Silver Prices and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.

Newsletters

Update Email
to get newsletters straight to your inbox
⚠️ Add your Email ID to receive Newsletters
Note: You will be signed up automatically after adding email

News for You

Set as Trusted Source
on Google Search
Add NDTV Profit As Google Preferred Source
Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com