U.K. Warns Banque Havilland Over ‘Improper’ Qatar Advice
(Bloomberg) -- Banque Havilland SA, the Luxembourg-based lender that counts Prince Andrew as one of its clients, was issued with a warning notice by the U.K. financial regulator over its alleged role in an economic boycott of Qatar.
Controlled by financier and U.K. Conservative Party backer David Rowland, the lender gave “improper advice” in a presentation that set out “manipulative trading practices” over Qatari bonds, the Financial Conduct Authority said Tuesday. The presentation could be taken to harm the Qatari economy, it said.
A spokesperson for Banque Havilland said no findings had yet been made by the regulator and it was challenging the warning notice through the FCA's internal processes. The warning “refers to historic allegations of misconduct at the bank's London premises in 2017.”
“None of the individuals referred to in the warning notice remains with the Bank,” the spokesperson said.
Banque Havilland told a court during litigation with the Qatari state in 2020 that it was cooperating with the U.K. regulator. In the civil suit, Qatar accused the lender of orchestrating a financial attack with the aim of destabilizing the riyal. The case has since settled “on a confidential basis,” a lawyer for Qatar said last month.
Tory Party Donor Accused of Hiding Emails In Qatar Fight
The presentation prepared for the chief executive of a United Arab Emirates sovereign wealth fund detailed an attempt to deplete the Qatar's reserves and damage its ability to host the soccer World Cup in 2022, the state alleged.
“In creating and disseminating the presentation, Banque Havilland exposed itself to the risk it might be used to further financial crime,” the FCA said in its notice.
Qatar said it needed to make a “massive fiscal intervention,” pouring money into the economy at the same time as its neighbors blockaded the gas-rich nation. The central bank liquidated assets and injected $1.6 billion while the Qatar Investment Authority deposited some $20 billion with domestic banks.
©2022 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.