Spotify’s Bet on The Joe Rogan Experience Exposes Rift in Audio Strategy
(Bloomberg Businessweek) -- Spotify Chief Executive Officer Daniel Ek signed a more than $100 million deal with Joe Rogan in 2020, presumably because he didn't want to have to worry so much about the music business. Spotify Technology SA has struggled to turn a profit after paying royalties to rights holders—even though the rates musicians take home from each stream are low enough to cause perennial anger. With podcasters, the company could sidestep all that, diversifying into an emerging media market. What better place to start than with Rogan, who hosts the most popular podcast in the world?
Wall Street got right on board. Spotify's stock spiked almost 20% the week it announced the deal, which gave it exclusive access to his hit show, The Joe Rogan Experience. But if the economics of podcasting has the potential to be superior to that of the music business, the medium also comes with its own set of challenges, as the recent flap over Rogan's show has demonstrated.
The issue got serious for Spotify in late January, when Neil Young demanded that the company either remove Rogan's podcast from its platform or pull his songs. “They can have Rogan or Young. Not both,” he wrote in a letter to his record company and management team. Young cited Rogan's history of peddling misinformation about Covid‑19 vaccines on his show, while also admitting he'd never listened to it.
Spotify, which has been grappling with how to police its Covid-related content since the pandemic began, has so far removed more than 20,000 podcast episodes that it saw as including Covid-related misinformation. Rogan's tendency to push the limits wasn't a revelation: The company has already deleted 40 episodes of his podcast. But few people can attract attention like Young can, and his action has inspired other musicians to pull their songs from the platform.
Not all the musicians boycotting Spotify agree on what upsets them. India.Arie abhors Rogan's views on race. The rock band Failure is mad at Spotify for not paying artists enough. Before his complaints about Rogan, Young removed his catalog to protest poor audio quality. Myriad conflicts with musicians have been a part of Spotify's operations throughout its history. The service pays artists a lower rate per stream than most of its competitors and is fighting a court case related to its payments to songwriters.
So far, artist activism has never lasted long enough to do any durable harm. In many cases, musicians don't even hold the rights they'd need to carry out a Young-style boycott; their record labels that do control their catalogs are less likely to take such idealistic stances. On the other hand, many musicians now are becoming less reliant on streaming services, and thus are able to protest without compromising their earnings.
This boycott has dragged on far longer than anyone at Spotify anticipated. It's prompted criticism of Rogan from fellow podcasters as well as Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, the Duchess and Duke of Sussex. So long as the company sticks with Rogan, it will be open to these conflicts. Last year, Spotify employees fumed when he hosted a guest whose comments were deemed transphobic. If you look through Rogan's catalog, you'll find something to offend just about everyone.
Spotify's share price plummeted on Feb. 2 after it reported disappointing subscriber growth in the last quarter of 2021. The company said it was too soon to know whether the controversy was having any impact on its business.
Spotify hosts more than 3 million podcasts, and many of the biggest music services—including YouTube and Amazon Music—host shows with material that musicians may not like. Musicians have been itching for a fight with Spotify, and podcasters are apt to attract listeners by pushing boundaries. Even if Young eventually ends his boycott, his fight against Rogan and Spotify feels like the beginning of a dispute, not the end.
Read next: How Twitter Tries Get Users to Be Nice on Social Media
©2022 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.