Biden DOJ Says Trump Officials Shouldn’t Pay for Migrant Trauma
(Bloomberg) -- Days after President Joe Biden announced a plan to help migrant families, his Justice Department finds itself fighting to get senior Trump administration officials off the hook for separating parents from their children at the border.
The department is defending officials, including former Homeland Security secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and former attorney general Jeff Sessions, from a lawsuit that seeks to hold them personally liable for the separations -- a policy that Biden called “a moral and national shame.”
On Friday the department filed support for the previous administration's request to dismiss the lawsuit -- which was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union in 2019 on behalf of thousands of families separated at the Arizona border.
Unlike in many of its challenges to immigration policies over the past four years, here the ACLU argues that individual officials should pay for trauma and suffering they allegedly caused -- and the advocacy group also seeks funding for mental health counseling. Allowing such claims against high-ranking federal officials to proceed would have profound policy implications and runs against Supreme Court rulings, the Justice Department said in its filing.
“Plaintiffs do not allege that they were separated due to the acts of some lone officer failing to follow the rules.” the U.S. argued. “To the contrary, the ‘conduct' plaintiffs challenge was the creation, purportedly by defendants, of the rules themselves.”
Read More: Biden Plans to Roll Back Trump's Refugee, Asylum Crackdowns
The ACLU wants to hold Nielsen, Sessions and others liable in a “Bivens action,” after a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that allows for damage claims against federal officers in their personal capacity for violations of someone's constitutional rights.
But the high court has more recently put limits on such cases, saying they shouldn't be permitted beyond the few very specific circumstances under which they previously had been allowed.The Justice Department said in its filing that the ACLU suit is exactly what the Supreme Court doesn't want.
Biden has already announced that his administration will overhaul a number of Donald Trump's immigration policies. ACLU lawyer Lee Gelernt said Thursday that the group would pursue its lawsuits but was open to settlement talks.
The case is A.I.I.L. v. Sessions, 19-cv-481, U.S. District Court, District of Arizona (Tucson).
©2021 Bloomberg L.P.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.