Volcker Rule Will Undergo `Material Changes,' Quarles Says
(Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Randal Quarles says U.S. financial regulators are working quickly to make “material changes” to the Volcker Rule, one of Wall Street's most hated post-crisis restrictions.
“The Volcker Rule is an example of a complex regulation that is not working well,” Quarles said Monday at an Institute of International Bankers conference in Washington, bringing into greater focus the overhaul effort involving the Fed and four other agencies.
The measure named for former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker was included in the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act as a way to reduce risk-taking by banning banks from trading with their own money. It has been a top target of Trump administration plans to dial back financial regulations as a way to spur economic growth.
The Treasury Department called for Volcker Rule changes when it released a series of reports last year on ways to revise financial industry rules. The five agencies responsible for the rule have been meeting since then to formulate a plan -- including at the agency-head level, Quarles said.
Market Making
Describing the rule as overly confusing and difficult to follow, Quarles said the Fed is devoting special attention to simplifying its definition of market making -- a permitted activity in which banks help their clients buy and sell assets. The Fed is considering giving banks more leeway to stockpile securities that they think their customers might want to trade, he said.
The rule's existing definition of market making “rests on a number of complex requirements that are difficult or impossible to verify in real time,” Quarles said. “As a result, banks spend far too much time and energy contemplating whether particular transactions or positions are consistent with the Volcker Rule.”
The regulation has been a focus of intense lobbying for years. It restricts lenders from investing in hedge funds and private-equity firms, while prohibiting proprietary trading -- the practice of banks trading for themselves instead of for clients.
The rule was meant to prevent firms with federally-backed deposit insurance and access to discount Fed loans from making big markets bets that could threaten economic stability. But critics says it has made banks too conservative, triggering a retrenchment from certain markets that has unnecessarily dried up liquidity.
Regulators Prep New Volcker Rule. Traders Salivate: QuickTake
Quarles said the agencies will “proceed with dispatch” in revising the regulation, which took the agencies three years to write after Dodd-Act was enacted. Despite the agencies' past difficulties in unifying on policy decisions, he said, “the odds are very good” for the group that includes the Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
“There are five rule writers for Volcker, which of course is one of the challenges,” said Craig Phillips, a counselor to the Treasury secretary who also spoke at the conference on Monday.
Still, he said there has been “positive momentum” with the Fed and OCC initially taking the lead on the revisions. He predicted that some agencies could announce “shortly” that they were considering rulemaking actions.
Addressing a room filled with officials of overseas banks Monday, Quarles also said that the Fed is weighing “additional tailoring and flexibility of our regulations” for foreign banks operating in the U.S. That could include easing Volcker's restrictions for how those firms can invest in foreign funds, he said.
--With assistance from Robert Schmidt
To contact the reporter on this story: Jesse Hamilton in Washington at jhamilton33@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Jesse Westbrook at jwestbrook1@bloomberg.net, Gregory Mott
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.