Get App
Download App Scanner
Scan to Download
Advertisement
This Article is From Mar 15, 2023

Tesla Accused In Consumer Suit Of Monopolizing Parts And Repairs

Tesla Accused In Consumer Suit Of Monopolizing Parts And Repairs
A logo is displayed on a Tesla Inc. electric vehicle charging at the Tesla Supercharger station in Fremont, California, U.S. (Photographer: Nina Riggio/Bloomberg)
STOCKS IN THIS STORY
Goenka Business & Finance Ltd.
--
Cosco (India) Ltd.
--
Nifty Top 20 Equal Weight
--
USD-INR
--
MSCI World
--
Pritika Auto Industries Ltd
--
Nifty EV & New Age Automotive
--
Cons Discretionary Goods & Serv
--
SAB Events & Governance Now Media Ltd.
--
BSE Finance
--
Space Incubatrics Technologies Ltd.
--
Cons Discretionary Goods & Serv
--
BSE Industrials
--
SVC Industries Ltd.
--
Lawreshwar Polymers Ltd.
--
Sarda Proteins Ltd.
--

Tesla Inc. was sued by customers who claim they've been forced to pay exorbitant prices and endure long waits for car repairs due to the company's monopolization of replacement parts and maintenance services.

The proposed class action was filed Tuesday in San Francisco federal court on behalf of Virginia M. Lambrix, who lives in Sonoma County and owns a Tesla Model S. She says owners of traditional combustion engine cars have multiple options for maintenance and repairs, or do the work themselves. Those repairs can rely on parts from the original manufacturer or parts made by other companies, according to the complaint.

Tesla owners, on the other hand, have just one option: getting their cars serviced by the company or a network of Tesla-approved service centers using only Tesla parts, according to the complaint, which cites federal antitrust laws. Lambrix argues the limitation is due to Tesla leveraging its market power to restrain repair and maintenance services.

The practices have caused Tesla owners “to suffer lengthy delays in repairing or maintaining their electric vehicles, only to pay supracompetitive prices for those parts and repairs once they are finally provided,” according to the complaint.

Tesla didn't immediately respond to an emailed request for comment. The carmaker reported $6.09 billion of services and other automotive revenue last year, which included paid use of its Superchargers, insurance services and merchandise sales.

The case is Lambrix v. Tesla, 23-cv-01145, US District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

©2023 Bloomberg L.P.

Essential Business Intelligence, Continuous LIVE TV, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.

Newsletters

Update Email
to get newsletters straight to your inbox
⚠️ Add your Email ID to receive Newsletters
Note: You will be signed up automatically after adding email

News for You

Set as Trusted Source
on Google Search