Get App
Download App Scanner
Scan to Download
Advertisement
This Article is From Nov 18, 2021

IBM Arbitration Gag Rules Are Illegal, Fired Workers Say

International Business Machines Corp.'s confidentiality rules about arbitration violate federal workplace law, two former employees alleged in labor board complaints.

In Wednesday filings with the National Labor Relations Board, ex-employees Jeffrey Rodriguez and Steve Apana wrote that IBM's “forced arbitration” policy includes a broad secrecy requirement that violates the National Labor Relations Act, which protects employees' right to communicate with each other about workplace issues and organize to address them. Their complaints also accused the company of “engaging in oppressive and threatening tactics in litigation and arbitration” and “enforcement efforts intended to suppress” legally-protected activism.

Read More: IBM Hit With New Class Lawsuit Over ‘Millennial' Hiring Push 

Rodriguez and Apana are among hundreds of workers currently in arbitration proceedings over their claims that IBM illegally fired them as part of a scheme to replace older employees with younger ones. IBM has denied wrongdoing and said that it “makes decisions based on the needs of its business units, not age.” The company didn't immediately respond to an inquiry about the new labor board filings.

In a 2018 ruling, a Republican-appointed U.S. Supreme Court majority ruled that U.S. labor law doesn't prevent companies from requiring that employees bring claims in individual arbitration hearings rather than courtroom class actions. But the new NLRB general counsel appointed by President Joe Biden, Jennifer Abruzzo, signaled in an August memo that she's interested in challenging the legality of companies' confidentiality rules, including those restricting disclosure of evidence or outcomes from arbitration hearings.

Shannon Liss-Riordan, a lawyer for the ex-employees, said IBM uses the confidentiality requirement to block workers from sharing information as they pursue complaints against the company.

“It had many workers sign an arbitration agreement which would require them to pursue their claims in individual arbitration,” she said. “Once they get to individual arbitration it tries to block them from cooperating with one another in order to help build their cases.” 

©2021 Bloomberg L.P.

Essential Business Intelligence, Continuous LIVE TV, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.

Newsletters

Update Email
to get newsletters straight to your inbox
⚠️ Add your Email ID to receive Newsletters
Note: You will be signed up automatically after adding email

News for You

Set as Trusted Source
on Google Search