Get App
Download App Scanner
Scan to Download
Advertisement
This Article is From Mar 09, 2017

Delhi High Court Bars Cipla From Selling Novartis’ Respiratory Drug

Delhi High Court Bars Cipla From Selling Novartis’ Respiratory Drug
General views of drugs (Photographer: JB Reed/Bloomberg News)

The Delhi High Court on Thursday barred Cipla Ltd. from manufacturing and selling a generic version of Swiss drugmaker Novartis AG's respiratory drug Onbrez in India.

In doing so, the 2-judge bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdev upheld an earlier order of the high court in January 2015 that restrained Cipla from making and selling Indacaterol – the generic name of Onbrez – until Cipla got compulsory licence for it.

Cipla challenged the order before the 2-judge bench, saying permission to make and sell the drug was in larger public interest as Novartis' drug was too expensive and made available only to government hospitals because of which is was not easily available to the public.

Responding to the plea, the Delhi High Court said on Thursday, “We do not feel that the appellant has even made out a case that public service would be disserved by the grant of an injunction. On the other hand, the respondents have established a prima facie case in that that patent is valid and, therefore, there is no credible challenge to the validity of the patent,” the bench said.

In 2014, Cipla launched Indacaterol under its own brand name at one-fifth of the original price. Novartis, which held the patent for the drug, moved the high court for infringement, saying it had partnered with Cipla's Indian rival Lupin Ltd. to sell the drug in India.

The judges said they could not arrive at a definite conclusion on whether “the extent of imports is not sufficient for meeting the demands of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in India”.

There are drugs available in the Indian market, besides Indacaterol, which deal with the management of COPD, the bench pointed out.

Noting that Indacaterol does not fall in the category of a life saving drug, such as a cancer medicine, the bench in its 27-page judgement declined Cipla's contention that public interest may be a factor in considering the grant of an injunction.

Essential Business Intelligence, Continuous LIVE TV, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.

Newsletters

Update Email
to get newsletters straight to your inbox
⚠️ Add your Email ID to receive Newsletters
Note: You will be signed up automatically after adding email

News for You

Set as Trusted Source
on Google Search