Investec has initiated coverage on Eternal with a Buy and a target price of Rs 375, while starting Swiggy at Hold with a target of Rs 310, laying out a clear preference for the former across both food delivery and quick commerce. The brokerage's core argument is that while both platforms operate in what remains a largely duopolistic market, execution, and the ability to scale profitably, is starting to separate the two.
On food delivery, Investec notes that the segment continues to look 'defensible for now,' with both players expected to clock around 17% growth and over 20% EBITDA expansion over FY26-30. Growth is being driven by steady gains in monthly transacting users, modest expansion in order values, and improving margins through operating leverage and ad monetisation.
At the same time, newer entrants remain in pilot mode and are pursuing different models, limiting near-term competitive pressure on incumbents.
Investec also flags valuation comfort, noting Eternal trades at 2.4x revenue and 4.5x EBITDA over FY26–28 estimates, while still delivering the fastest growth among large-cap consumer names under its coverage.
Quick Commerce: Where the Gap Widens
Investec characterises the quick commerce space as 'survival of the fittest,' with 40%+ growth projected over FY26-30 even as competition intensifies. The brokerage notes that while Swiggy trails Eternal by roughly 18–24 months in food delivery, the gap in quick commerce runs deeper — 'several years' by its assessment.
Here, Eternal is seen as having a clear edge. Its platform Blinkit offers stronger scale, better unit economics and higher visibility on profitability. Swiggy's Instamart, by contrast, is viewed as still working its way to breakeven, with lower visibility and continued investment intensity weighing on the outlook.
Beyond core segments, Investec flags emerging businesses, particularly going-out and ticketing, as an asset-light opportunity. Eternal's District platform is seen as broader in scope, while Swiggy's offerings remain more limited at this stage. That said, these verticals are still small, contributing under 3% of Eternal's and less than 7% of Swiggy's valuation, though the brokerage expects their share to rise over time.
The preference for Eternal ultimately comes down to scale, execution and financial visibility. The company is seen as better positioned across all three key platforms (food delivery, quick commerce and emerging segments) with stronger unit economics and lower cash burn.
ALSO READ: Zomato, Swiggy Commissions Too High? Macquarie Flags 30% Downside On Food Delivery Stocks
Essential Business Intelligence, Continuous LIVE TV, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.
