Rajiv Jain's Reappointment As Bajaj Finance VC Gets Thumbs Down From Proxy Advisory Firm IiAS
Proxy advisory firm IiAS has recommended Bajaj Finance Ltd. shareholders to vote against the reappointment of Rajeev Jain as vice chairman and executive director, citing concerns over corporate governance and transparency.
The board has sought approval from shareholders to reappoint Jain as vice chairman for three years from April 2025 and redesignate Anup Kumar Saha as managing director from April till the remainder of his tenure in March 2028. The voting commenced on May 9 and will end on June 7.
On both proposals, IiAS marked them under its 'Governance Matters' parameter which indicates corporate governance practices that have room for improvement or are non-compliant with regulations or their intent.
It also flagged a lack of adequate disclosures supporting the resolutions and advised investors to seek further clarifications from the company to make a more informed decision.
The opinion from the proxy advisory firm differs from analysts tracking India's most valuable non-bank finance company who have said Rajeev Jain's continuity in Bajaj Finance's senior leadership should improve investor confidence and sentiment and end the long-standing uncertainty. The announcement was made in March.
Besides, IiAS recommended voting in favour of the company's proposals to issue bonus shares and split the stock in a 1:2 ratio.
The company has over seven lakh public shareholders who own 45.17% equity. Retail investors with a nominal share capital of up to Rs 2 lakh hold 6% stake.
Shares of Bajaj Finance closed 0.95% higher at Rs 9254.4 apiece on the BSE, compared to a 0.33% decline in the benchmark Sensex. The stock has risen 37% in the last 12 months and 33% on a year-to-date basis.
Out of the 38 analysts tracking the company, 22 have a 'buy' rating on the stock, 12 recommend 'hold' and five suggest 'sell', according to Bloomberg data. The average of 12-month analysts' price targets implies a potential upside of 2%.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.