(Bloomberg Opinion) -- When Donald Trump slapped a travel ban on Europe back in March to halt the spread of Covid-19, the U.S. president declared it āthe most aggressive and comprehensive effort to confront a virus in modern historyā āĀ and heĀ criticized the European Union for not having acted quickly enough to doĀ the same.
The tables have turned.Ā Today, it's the EU that is leaving American tourists out in the cold with its newĀ shortlistĀ of 14 countries deemed safe for non-essential travel. Despite Trump's bluster, the U.S.Ā has racked upĀ more than double the total caseload of the EU's 27 members, and it hasn't made the cut. Countries including Canada, Japan andĀ Morocco have. China will be added to the list, provided it lifts its own curbs on European visitors.
While politically this will sting, it is at heart an epidemiological decision, as my colleague Andreas Kluth has pointed out.Ā As if to prove that flight bans aren't actually all that effective, especially when compared to domestic measures like widespread testing and movement curbs, the U.S.'s record in controlling the infectionĀ curveĀ remains poor. In the two weeks to June 29, cumulative casesĀ per 100,000 people (the EU's preferred metric)Ā stood at 137 in the U.S., one of the highest rates in the world. They were below 10Ā in France, Italy, and Spain.
Still, the comfort of statistics belies the general knottiness of lifting travel restrictions in Europe, which involves coordinating 27 member states with sometimesĀ different priorities and policies.
To start with, the approved list isn't a law per se, but a recommendation āĀ border controls remain the preserve of national governments. While nobody expects a country to unilaterally fling open its doors to Americans, enforcement is going to be an issue. The ban wasn't exactly watertight in the first place, as my Bloomberg News colleagues have reported, with allowances made for U.S. citizens living in the EU, Europeans living in the U.S., students and others. Countries such as Ireland and DenmarkĀ aren't evenĀ part of the common border policy. Denmark is unlikely to take a relaxed approach to touristsĀ given it was one of the first European countries to restrict travel and impose stay-at-home measures on its people.Ā But its exemptions includeĀ businesspeople, au pairsĀ and boarding-school students too.
Making matters even more confusing, travel within the EU still won't beĀ completely free even ifĀ the bloc has called for an end to internal border restrictions, restoring the free movement that symbolizes the unity of its single market. Some EU membersĀ are keeping others at bay over their handling of the virus. That means some nationsĀ will likely now be welcoming tourists from thousands of kilometers away while snubbing their own neighbors. Travelers from Sweden, for example, whose 14-day case rate is almost as high as the U.S.'s, are restricted from freely entering countries including Norway, Denmark, the NetherlandsĀ and Cyprus. Brits are also personae non grataeĀ in places such as Greece, where direct flights from the U.K. and Sweden aren't allowed until July 15. It's not only Americans who will have to wait.
How to handle China raisesĀ other complications. The country should be a shoo-in based on how few new cases it's reporting, but questions remain over how itĀ handled the outbreak and the trustworthiness of its data crunching in the past. The Europeans have managed a workaround by askingĀ the country to lift its own restrictions on EU travelers before itĀ can fully make its way onto the EU's whitelist. Maybe there's a guide here for how Trump could get the go-ahead from the EU, provided hisĀ handling of the pandemic also improves. It's not all down to data.Ā
For all the loopholes andĀ muddles involved inĀ lifting theĀ EU's travel restrictions, it's reassuring that it's happening at all āĀ you have to start somewhere. But the freedom ofĀ countries to go their own way, on top of theĀ the World Health Organization's warning that the pandemic is ānot even close to being over,ā means the unpredictabilityĀ will be with us a while yet.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Brussels. He previously worked at Reuters and Forbes.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.
Essential Business Intelligence, Continuous LIVE TV, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice and Latest Stories ā On NDTV Profit.