Trump’s Big-Money Cavalry Never Rode to His Rescue
(Bloomberg) -- On Monday, Donald Trump's campaign was asking fans to send $5 or $10 to buy pizza and snacks for election-day volunteers. He's ending his campaign against Hillary Clinton the way he began it: heavily outspent by his opponent.
Trump can't blame his financial disadvantage on a lack of wealthy supporters. Some of them promised that big money was coming, but never followed through. And as of Sunday, even Trump himself hadn't spent nearly as much on his own campaign as he promised.
Overall, Clinton and her allies raised more than $1 billion through Oct. 19, the last date for which comprehensive figures are available, compared with about half that for Trump and his allies. Support from super-political action committees, which can accept donations of unlimited size, was particularly lopsided in Clinton's favor.
If Trump wins the election today, he'll have millions of middle-class fans to thank for financing most of his campaign -- people who sent $35 over the Internet in response to his daily entreaties, and helped him smash the Republican record for small-donor fundraising. If he loses, these are some of the deep-pocketed supporters who didn't come through for him:
306649170
Sheldon Adelson
1. Sheldon Adelson. Earlier this year, the New York Times reported the Las Vegas casino mogul offered to spend as much as $100 million on Trump. Trump and his team occasionally bragged about the offer. Adelson and his wife actually spent at least $10 million on Trump, and possibly more -- but nowhere near $100 million.
2. Carl Icahn. The billionaire investor made a video praising Trump last year, and told Bloomberg News in August that he was considering forming a super-PAC to support the campaign. He didn't.
3. Tom Barrack. The real-estate investor and close friend of Trump's appeared on CNN in June, claiming he'd raised $32 million for a new pro-Trump super-PAC. Then Barrack abruptly distanced himself from the group, and didn't give it a cent. It's on track to spend about $20 million.
Tom Barrack
4. Trump. In recent weeks, he pledged again and again to put $100 million into his campaign. So far, he hasn't. His actual giving, as of Sunday, stood at $66 million. At this point, it's probably too late for a last-minute cash infusion to have any impact.
‘He Choked'
Trump's failure to live up to his own promise is particularly surprising, because he's repeated the $100 million pledge so frequently and so recently.
"He choked," said Charles Spies, a Republican election lawyer who was chief financial officer of Mitt Romney's 2008 presidential campaign and who doesn't support Trump.
Spies estimates that Trump, who is narrowly trailing Clinton in the polls, might be leading if he'd put more of his money into the campaign early on, and used it for television advertising. His refusal to do so is one reason other wealthy donors refused to back him, Spies said.
Representatives for Trump, Adelson, Icahn, and Barrack either declined to comment or didn't respond to requests for comment on Monday.
Anthony Scaramucci, a top Trump fundraiser and surrogate, says most Trump supporters are just grateful for what he did contribute. "$66 million is a lot of scharole," he said.
Late last month, Trump seemed to signal a last-minute deluge of cash was coming.
Matching Money
In at least three separate e-mails sent out under his name on Oct. 27, and one under the name of his son, Eric, Trump offered to "triple match" any contributions he received between then and the end of the month.
"We can't leave anything on the table," one of the e-mails said. "That's why I am making this HUGE final investment to win, by triple matching every contribution we receive by midnight, October 31st."
Unlike similar offers he's made in the past, the e-mails didn't mention any upper limit to his contribution. If fundraising continued on its normal pace, the offer could easily have put Trump on the hook for $20 million or $30 million.
But the offer wasn't mentioned again after the 27th, and the campaign didn't respond to repeated questions about what happened to it. Trump did indeed contribute to his campaign the following day, but it was only $10 million, bringing his cumulative total to $66 million.
Also on the 28th, Trump wouldn't commit to meeting the $100 million pledge during an appearance on Fox News. "What it takes is what it takes," he told Fox's Bret Baier.
By Oct. 31, he was throwing the $100 million figure around again at a rally in Michigan. And as Election Day approached, the Trump campaign ratcheted up its fundraising pitches, asking for as little as $15 from donors online. "JOIN NOW with an emergency contribution," Trump wrote in one of at least five emails his campaign sent on Monday. "I need your help more than ever."
To contact the reporter on this story: Zachary R. Mider in New York at zmider1@bloomberg.net. To contact the editors responsible for this story: Joshua Gallu at jgallu@bloomberg.net, Justin Blum
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets
-
India Is Going Abroad For Critical Minerals. But It May Take Years To Pay Off | The Reason Why
Although India's steps are in the right direction, they remain modest compared with India's growing dependence.
-
When Everyone Has AI, What Gives You An Edge?
India's young workforce is entering an uncertain world of work where powerful AI tools are becoming widely accessible. The advantage will belong to those who combine deep expertise with digital fluency, and the distinctly human capabilities that technology cannot manufacture.
-
Wrong Labels, High Pesticide Residues Holding Back Agri Exports | The Reason Why
India needs stronger domestic food-safety and labelling standards, with best practices becoming part of everyday business for farmers, traders and food companies.