Stocks Forgo $5 Trillion on Trade Clashes, Deutsche Bank Says
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump's raging trade war may have prevented U.S. equities from adding as much as $5 trillion, Deutsche Bank says.
That's how much stocks could have gained if the S&P 500 Index had kept its 12.5% annual pace of appreciation since 2009, according to strategists led by Binky Chadha. And it equals to a forgone return of 17%, based on the current market capitalization. But the equity measure has made little headway since the Trump administration swung into action on trade in January 2018.
The analysis also diverges from the view that the trade tiff has done little long-term damage to markets. Indeed, while the S&P 500 has retreated for four straight weeks since Trump threatened higher levies on additional Chinese imports, the benchmark still sits 5% from its all-time high through Thursday. Historically, pullbacks of this size have occurred every two or three months.
“It is tempting therefore to conclude that equity markets are complacent or even pricing in the long-term gain relative to the short-run pain,” Chadha wrote in a note to clients. “We would disagree strongly.”
Viewed from a wider lens, he said, the trade issue has morphed into one that rivals the 2015-2016 oil shock and the 2011-2012 sovereign-debt crisis. While trade tension is arguably only one hurdle to arise in the past 17 months, its emergence coincides with a prolonged market pause, making it a possible culprit, according to Chadha.
The exercise is also one way to gauge the potential economic damage since the market tends to discount future implications, he added. In that regard, the cost isn't negligible. By the firm's count, the missed equity gains are already worth 12 years of U.S. trade deficit with China.
The S&P 500 fell 1.3% as of 10:15 a.m. in New York as Trump threatened to place escalating tariffs on Mexico, and as China said it's ready to restrict the sale of rare-earth minerals to America.
To contact the reporter on this story: Lu Wang in New York at lwang8@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Brad Olesen at bolesen3@bloomberg.net, ;Jeremy Herron at jherron8@bloomberg.net, Rita Nazareth, Andrew Dunn
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.