Eskom Deceived Central Bank About China Huarong Loan, Probe Told
(Bloomberg) -- South Africa's state power utility deliberately deceived the central bank to ensure it was granted permission to conclude a 25 billion-rand ($1.8-billion) loan agreement with China's Huarong Energy Africa, according to a senior company official.
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd. gave the South African Reserve Bank incomplete and inaccurate information about the loan, meaning it was unable to make a properly informed decision about whether to give it the go-ahead, Sincedile Shweni, a corporate specialist at the utility's treasury department, told a judicial commission in Johannesburg on Monday. Had the correct information been supplied, the deal would have fallen through, he said.
The commission, headed by Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, was established to probe allegations that billions of rand of taxpayer funds was stolen from the government coffers by allies of former President Jacob Zuma with his tacit consent, with Eskom a prime target during the looting spree. Zuma has denied wrongdoing.
The loan agreement between Eskom and Huarong was signed by the utility's then-acting Chief Executive Officer Sean Maritz and Huarong Energy Africa Chairman Jianbao Chen in October 2017. Maritz was suspended from his post in January 2018 and resigned two months later. Testimony before the commission has implicated Maritz in taking kickbacks on the deal, an allegation he denies.
Huarong's offer of a loan was unsolicited and wasn't processed by Eskom's asset risk and liability committee, which would normally consider such proposals and critically analyse them, according to Shweni. The deal was instead referred to one of the utility's more senior management structures, a “suspicious” deviation from the normal procedure, he said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Nkululeko Ncana in Johannesburg at nncana@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Karl Maier at kmaier2@bloomberg.net, Mike Cohen, Paul Richardson
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.