Chinese Investors Grow Wary of Australia as Tensions Rise
(Bloomberg) -- Chinese investors are turning cautious on Australia as a survey showed the No. 2 economy's state-owned enterprises pulled back on deals for the first time in three years.
Total investment by Chinese buyers Down Under dropped 11 percent to $10.3 billion in 2017 from a year earlier, according to a KPMG LLP and University of Sydney report. While that's part of a global trend after China tightened foreign investment rules and clamped down on capital outflows, the decline also reflects mounting political tensions, the report said.
“Sentiment has currently shifted, with a higher level of apprehension by Chinese investors towards investing in Australia,” said Hans Hendrischke, co-author and professor of Chinese business & management at the University of Sydney. “Seventy percent of respondents stated that the political debate had made Chinese companies more cautious about investing in Australia.”
Ties have soured since December, when Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull cited reports of Chinese meddling with media, universities and lawmakers as a catalyst for tougher anti-foreign interference laws. Officials in Beijing accused Australia of running an anti-China campaign and exports of wine and meat have reportedly struggled to clear Chinese customs.
At a commercial level, the stakes are high: Australia is the most China-dependent developed economy, with about 36 percent of total shipments going to the mainland.
Major Chinese Investments in Australia 2017:
Australian Target | Chinese Buyer | Value (A$) |
| Yancoal Australia | 3.4b |
| New Hope/Temasek | 1b |
| CITIC Capital Partners & Humanwell Healthcare | 800m |
| HNA Group | 400m |
| Hengkang Medical Group | 337m |
The ‘Demystifying Chinese Investment' report showed investments by Chinese state-owned enterprises, or SOEs, dropped in both number and value for the first time since 2014. The overall decline in the value of investment last year was largely driven by an 89 percent fall in new infrastructure investment.
On a brighter side, private investment is picking up. Such buyers accounted for 83 percent of Chinese deal volume and 60 percent of deal value in 2017, up from 78 percent and 49 percent, respectively, in 2016.
Significant growth was also seen in mining -- for the first time in several years -- and healthcare. The former's surge was mainly due to Yancoal Australia Ltd.'s purchase of Rio Tinto Group's thermal coal assets.
Other Key Findings:
- Just 35% of surveyed Chinese companies said they felt welcome to invest in Australia, down from 52% in 2014, blaming political tensions
- Overall, Chinese investors find Australia a safer environment than many other countries due to the rule of law, stable market institutions and comprehensive policies
- The Chinese government's regulatory changes have impacted new investment in Australia, said 77% of respondents
- Tighter currency controls have also made it more difficult for Chinese companies to source finance from China, said 65% of participants
Still, the report found that despite the regulatory hurdles and political tensions, the relationship between China and Australia is deepening and maturing in trade and investment.
“There is a growing familiarity and confidence in the Australian market,” Hendrischke said. “While most Chinese investors retained a level of optimism about their Australian investments, some investors, especially SOEs, are apprehensive due to diplomatic tensions.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael Heath in Sydney at mheath1@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Nasreen Seria at nseria@bloomberg.net, Chris Bourke, Peter Vercoe
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.