All the Ways Trump Can (And Can’t) Influence Powell’s Fed Policy
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump isn't happy that the Federal Reserve is raising interest rates. There's not much he can do about it.
The central bank is intentionally insulated from day-to-day U.S. politics, with officials' terms lasting as long as 14 years. The president appoints members to the Board of Governors in Washington, including the Fed chairman, and can only fire governors “for cause.” The Senate must sign off on replacements, so remaking the central bank by removal is an inherently risky strategy. That leaves the president with a more primary tool when it comes to influencing the Fed: complaining. Trump seems to be taking that route.
“The U.S. is raising rates while the dollars (sic) gets stronger and stronger with each passing day -- taking away our big competitive edge,” the president tweeted Friday, a day after laying into the Fed in a CNBC interview.
Here's a rundown of what the executive office can and can't do when it comes to influencing rate policy.
1. CAN: Hire, Fire
The Federal Reserve Act says governors may be “removed for cause by the President.” Since the chairman is also a governor, that presumably extends to him or her, but the rules around firing the leader are legally ambiguous, as Peter Conti-Brown of the University of Pennsylvania notes in his book on Fed independence.
The act doesn't specify what “cause” means, and no Fed chief in the modern era has been subject to that provision, though Thomas McCabe was forced to resign after clashing with Harry Truman's administration. William Miller served for just over a year before President Jimmy Carter moved him to the U.S. Treasury in 1979.
Presidents can and do pick someone else when the term of a sitting chairman ends. Trump himself chose Powell to replace Janet Yellen, whom he inherited from Barack Obama. The president can also appoint governors to the Fed board in Washington, which is an important power: the seven officials vote constantly and make up more than half of the 12-member Federal Open Market Committee.
2. CAN'T: Guarantee Doves
Interestingly, among Trump's picks for the board to date -- Randal Quarles, Marvin Goodfriend, Richard Clarida, and Michelle Bowman -- none are known as decidedly dovish. Only Quarles has been confirmed by the Senate so far.
Even if Trump had nominated doves, they would have to make it past Republicans in the Senate to win confirmation, and many Senate conservatives tend to back a Fed focused on containing inflation rather than lowering unemployment.
3. CAN: Complain
Trump isn't the first president to take issue with the Fed's rate hikes, and his predecessors have met with varying success in actually influencing policy.
In December 1965, Lyndon Johnson famously summoned Fed Chairman William McChesney Martin to his ranch in Stonewall, Texas, to confront him over Martin's decision to lift rates. Martin didn't cave.
Not long after, President Richard Nixon demanded Chairman Arthur Burns goose the economy with low rates ahead of the 1972 election. When Burns didn't immediately cooperate, the White House planted a false story in the press that Burns was seeking a big pay raise, according to a book by Nixon speechwriter William Safire. Eventually Burns relented.
Most recently, George H.W. Bush's White House pushed Alan Greenspan behind the scenes on rates and openly called on the Fed to lower its benchmark in June 1992. Greenspan did cut rates 13 times over 1991-92, but slowed the pace of reductions in the latter year, to the White House's annoyance.
Since President Bill Clinton's tenure, executives have avoided talking about Fed policy. Trump isn't sticking to that script.
4. CAN'T: Directly Influence
Trump told CNBC Thursday that while he was “not thrilled” about rate increases, “at the same time, I'm letting them do what they feel is best.” Still, the president can't disallow rate decisions: he has no sign-off authority on Fed policy, similar to the autonomy central banks are afforded throughout the developed world.
The FOMC sets policy as it sees fit -- decisions require no lawmaker approval. The Fed's regional voters are very insulated from politics: they're selected by their districts, and only the Fed Board has veto power over their appointments. Even the Fed's budget isn't appropriated by Congress, though an inspector general does keep an eye on the institution.
Still, threats to that independence have flared up -- particularly because of the Fed's bailouts of institutions during the financial crisis -- and the central bank defends its ground tooth-and-nail. Lawmakers for example have previously called for congressional audits of the Fed's monetary policy. Fed officials say that would risk politicizing rate-setting, worsening boom-and-bust swings.
--With assistance from Christopher Condon.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jeanna Smialek in New York at jsmialek1@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Brendan Murray at brmurray@bloomberg.net, Scott Lanman, Jeff Kearns
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets