For Google Rejects, Team Effort to Prove Age Bias Advances
(Bloomberg) -- Google failed to block a class-action lawsuit by rejected job applicants who accuse the search engine giant of systematically favoring younger candidates.
U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman in San Jose, California, issued a ruling Wednesday throwing out the internet search giant's request to deny group status to as many as 265 people 40 years and older who sought to join the case. The judge said her decision will remain sealed for now because it contains “highly confidential and business-sensitive” information, while directing both sides to advise her what language should be redacted so that the ruling can be made public.
Age discrimination cases are notoriously difficult to win, in part because courts have moved toward deferring to employers on what's a “reasonable” business decision on matters of hiring and firing.
“We believe that proceeding collectively will help us set a strong precedent preventing discrimination against older workers, which has become a substantial issue, especially in the tech industry,” Daniel Low, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in an email.
The case is spearheaded by a woman engineer who was interviewed by Google four times from 2007 to 2014, starting when she was 47. She claims that because of her age, she was never offered employment despite having “highly pertinent qualifications and programming experience.”
Cheryl Fillekes alleged that Google's hiring process -- even if it appeared neutral -- resulted in a “practice and pattern” of discrimination against older applicants. It did this in various ways, including by emphasizing abstract, theoretical interview questions in line with current college engineering curriculum and placing an emphasis on “Googleyness” and cultural fit, thereby promulgating its youthful demographic, according to the complaint, which put the median age of Google employees at 29.
Freeman allowed the woman's lawyers in 2016 to solicit other job seekers who claimed to have been denied employment because of age.
After evaluating the rejected applicants' claims, Google argued there are too many variations among their allegations for the case to hold together as a class action. Google has denied that it engages in age discrimination.
The company said that when its lawyers questioned dozens of job seekers who sought to join the case, some said they performed well on the company's technical engineering quiz and didn't criticize it, unlike Fillekes. Google also said “some plaintiffs who interviewed multiple times performed better after age 40 than when under age 40.”
Google's press office didn't respond to a request for comment on the ruling.
The case is Fillekes v. Google LLC, 15-cv-01824, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose).
To contact the reporters on this story: Peter Blumberg in San Francisco at pblumberg1@bloomberg.net;Robert Burnson in San Francisco at rburnson@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Elizabeth Wollman at ewollman@bloomberg.net, Peter Blumberg
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
A New Samvat Wishlist: Inclusive Prosperity And Human Development
India has strengthened its economic foundations through infrastructure, digital access and enterprise. Its next growth chapter must deepen productivity, create better livelihoods and widen participation in prosperity.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.