SpaceX Starship Destroyed In Third Straight Fiery Test Setback
SpaceX's colossal Starship rocket suffered a leak, tumbled out of control in space and disintegrated as it hurtled back to Earth during a test flight on Tuesday, in a third setback in a row for the Elon Musk-led company.
The launch system, comprised of the Starship upper portion and its Super Heavy booster, thundered off the company's launchpad in South Texas at around 6:36 p.m. local time. As the rocket lifted off, around 1.1 million people tuned in on X.
A few minutes into the flight, the recycled Super Heavy booster separated from the Starship upper portion and fired its engines. But as it maneuvered itself into position and plunged back to Earth, it suffered an apparent problem and exploded, SpaceX commentators said, adding that it was expected to make a hard splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico regardless.
Starship made it to the scheduled ship engine cutoff, so big improvement over last flight! Also, no significant loss of heat shield tiles during ascent.
May 28, 2025
Leaks caused loss of main tank pressure during the coast and re-entry phase. Lot of good data to review.
Launch cadence for…SpaceX then appeared to fall short of another key milestone planned for the mission: using Starship to deploy a slate of dummy satellites. Starship made it to space but launch commentators said the vehicle's bay door didn't open as expected, cutting that test short. The satellite simulators are designed to mimic upgraded Starlink internet satellites the rocket is meant to carry when it's operational.
Then around 35 minutes into the mission, as Starship hurtled toward Earth's atmosphere on its journey home, the livestream started to cut in and out. At one point, SpaceX commentator Dan Huot told viewers the vehicle had lost control and that the rocket was spinning, unable to set itself up for a controlled reentry and to withstand the intense heat and pressure of the atmosphere during descent. The vehicle “met its demise,” said another SpaceX commentator, Jessie Anderson.
“We have been dealing with some leaks on the ship,” Huot said, referring to its fuel tank systems. “This is also what led to that loss of attitude control.”
SpaceX stressed that the company learns from every test flight. “We're going to learn, iterate and iterate over and over again,” Anderson said.
After the launch, Musk had planned an all-hands-style talk with employees at 8 p.m. local time out of the company's newly incorporated city, Starbase, in South Texas. As of 9 p.m., it hadn't started and there was no word on why. The mission came as Musk, the world's richest person, says he is stepping back from his political work in Washington and focusing on his business empire.
The Federal Aviation Administration, which licenses Starship flights, said it was aware “an anomaly occurred” and is actively working with SpaceX on the event. There are no reports of public injury or damage to public property, it added.
The stakes for Tuesday's flight were particularly high after flights in January and March were cut short just minutes after takeoff when the spacecraft exploded over the Gulf of Mexico, sending streams of debris raining down from the sky and disrupting air travel.
The results failed to live up to earlier flights when the vehicle made it to space, partially circled the globe, survived the plunge through the atmosphere and splashed into the ocean roughly as planned.
Starship is critical to Musk's and SpaceX's Mars vision. As the world's largest and most powerful launch system, Starship is meant to serve as the primary spacecraft for transporting people to the Red Planet and then bringing them back to Earth. Musk has recently declared that SpaceX will send a Starship rocket to Mars carrying robots built by his electric car company, Tesla Inc., as early as 2026 — an incredibly ambitious timeline.
SpaceX also holds contracts with NASA worth roughly $4 billion to land the agency's astronauts on the moon with Starship — making it a key part of America's space ambitions.
Past Failures
SpaceX blamed the botched January test on unexpectedly intense vibrations that worsened a propellant leak, leading to fires throughout the vehicle. As for the March failure, the company said that one of Starship's Raptor engines likely had a hardware issue, causing propellants to mix together at the wrong time and ultimately leading to the explosion.
The company said it led investigations into each of the incidents and made fixes to prevent the problems from happening again. The company also said that the two failures were “distinctly different” from one another, despite the explosions occurring around the same time in each flight. Additionally, future Starship vehicles will be equipped with new “Raptor 3” engines that are supposed to be more reliable.
Despite the repeated flight failures, SpaceX was still able to “catch” Starship's massive Super Heavy booster back at the rocket's launch tower following each flight — an impressive feat the company managed to do for the first time last year.
For this ninth launch, the company didn't attempt a midair capture of the vehicle. Instead, SpaceX chose to re-fly one of the Super Heavy boosters it caught previously — a first for the company.
As if the flight test was not exciting enough, Starship experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly. Teams will continue to review data and work toward our next flight test.
May 28, 2025
With a test like this, success comes from what we learn, and today's test will help us improve Starship's…Designed to be fully reusable, Starship will be much cheaper to fly than any other rocket, according to SpaceX, and will eventually replace the company's industry-leading Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets.
But to meet that promise of delivering a fully reusable rocket, SpaceX must refine its technique for recovering all of the pieces of Starship after launch.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.
