Vanguard Founder Jack Bogle's Investment Tips, 12 Years Later
(Bloomberg) -- Jack Bogle's long-lost investment advice looks pretty good with hindsight.
Back in March 2007, the late Vanguard Group Inc. founder wrote an article for a men's magazine laying out four fundamental tips. Though it didn't make it into print at the time, the editor who worked with Bogle dug it up for Barron's to publish 12 years later.
Bogle recommended a simple portfolio consisting of a bond index fund and a stock index fund, adjusted for the investor's age. A 40-year-old investor who followed his advice and did nothing would have earned an annualized 7.3 percent, turning $100,000 into $236,000 by May 1, 2019, according to Barron's. Vanguard's 2035 target-date fund returned an annualized 6.1 percent over that period, which includes the Great Recession bear market that cut stock prices in half.
Bogle's four tips? Focus on costs, diversify broadly, allocate prudently and stay the course. For anyone saying there might be better options than simply buying and holding two funds, his response was that the number of worse strategies is infinite.
“Successful investing doesn't require sophistication and complexity; all that's necessary is a healthy dose of common sense,” Bogle wrote, according to Barron's.
He wasn't as keen on the exchange-traded funds born out of his index funds. Ironically, advisers these days are making active bets through passive ETFs, straying far from the Bogle doctrine of low-cost, broadly diversified index investing, according to Barron's.
Bogle, who died at age 89 in January, brought low-cost index-based mutual funds to the mainstream, saying that most stock-picking money managers weren't worth the fees they charged.
To contact the reporter on this story: Hailey Waller in New York at hwaller@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: James Ludden at jludden@bloomberg.net, Tony Czuczka, Linus Chua
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.