Stocks Get a Jarring ‘Adjustment:’ Wall Street Reacts to Powell
(Bloomberg) -- Two words from Jerome Powell did something that two months of trade uncertainty couldn't: send the S&P 500 to a single-session loss exceeding 1%.
The Federal Reserve chairman's characterization of Wednesday's interest-rate cut as a "mid-cycle adjustment" sent hearts beating nervously around Wall Street as concern grew that a full-blown easing cycle isn't in the offing. Despite his best efforts to signal that additional cuts aren't ruled out, markets remained on edge.
Here's how strategists and traders reacted:
- Delores Rubin, a senior equity trader at Deutsche Bank Wealth Management
“The market was fine with the statement, but as seems to be the case, the press conference reveals details that do not sit well with the market. The response that this is a mid-cycle adjustment and not part of a longer term accommodative stance has raised concerns. The market has really talked itself into a need for lower rates. Obviously the FOMC still feels strongly the economy is resilient.”
- Zhiwei Ren, Penn Mutual Asset Management portfolio manager.
“The market pricing is for 3 more cuts for the next one year. He is pushing back that market pricing. He says this is a mid-cycle rate cut, which means it is 1-2 cuts and done...he is not giving the market what it wants -- three cuts for next year. He basically said ‘At the beginning of the year, we were pricing a few hikes and turned patient -- no rate hike, no cut -- and now we're cutting 25 bps. We think that's accommodative enough.' he didn't say they need to cut more. That's a big surprise to me and the market.”
- Max Gokhman, the head of asset allocation for Pacific Life Fund Advisors.
“Two possible reasons. One is that the market thinks an ‘adjustment' is a one-and-done thing. I doubt that's the case, especially because there was also language in the statement about the ‘future path' of rates being a subject of future data. To be clear, I'm not saying the market isn't worried that it's one-and-done -- that's just not how I'm seeing it. The second reason is perhaps the market thinks that when Powell says “mid-cycle” he is giving credence to the (ahem) fact that business cycles have a beginning, middle and... END. Most likely the first reason is what moved prices though.”
- Charlie Smith, founding partner and chief investment officer at Fort Pitt Capital Group in Pittsburgh.
“The catalyst for sell-on-the-news was that phrase. He made it explicit -- basically, that's what that phrase means. An insurance cut implied ‘Hey, it's just an insurance policy. It's a one-time premium and we're done.' And then he made it explicit with that sentence and the market figured it out.”
- Matt Maley, equity strategist at Miller Tabak + Co.
“His comment about an ‘adjustment' probably means that those looking for an aggressive easing cycle over the next six to nine months are not going to see it. What it means is that there was a divergence between what investors were saying and what they were pricing in. Investors wanted Powell to say that he's cutting, but they really wanted to see the Fed embarking on a rate-cutting cycle. The consensus belief on what the Fed would do was correct. It's just that the markets pricing in an aggressive cycle of rate cuts were way off.”
--With assistance from Elena Popina.
To contact the reporters on this story: Vildana Hajric in New York at vhajric1@bloomberg.net;Sarah Ponczek in New York at sponczek2@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Jeremy Herron at jherron8@bloomberg.net, Chris Nagi
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
A New Samvat Wishlist: Inclusive Prosperity And Human Development
India has strengthened its economic foundations through infrastructure, digital access and enterprise. Its next growth chapter must deepen productivity, create better livelihoods and widen participation in prosperity.
-
Love, Sex Aur Dhokha: The Audacious Plot To Spy On Jensen Huang
A Taipei dinner, a Singapore chip buyer and a suspected Chinese asset: inside the alleged spy operation that got close to NVIDIA's Jensen Huang.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.