Market Bulls Are Betting on a Sharp and Shallow Fed Rate-Hike Cycle
(Bloomberg) -- While trying to map the speed of Federal Reserve interest-rate hikes has unleashed harrowing volatility in equities, expectations about the central bank's destination are keeping things from spinning completely out of control.
Despite a series of dramatic repricings following last week's policy meeting, traders still anticipate the Fed's tightening campaign to top out below 1.75% by the end of 2023, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That's well below the range of 2.25% to 2.5% in the fourth quarter of 2018, a period of far worse turbulence for investors.
A low ceiling for Fed rate hikes, sturdy earnings expectations and still-strong economic growth underlie the stock bull case at the start of 2022. The S&P 500 closed out its biggest two-day rally since April 2020 on Monday, following a week that saw the benchmark post three of the worst intraday reversals of the decade. While the churn is a byproduct of the Fed lifting rates effectively from zero, risk appetites should be OK as long as perceptions hold that the central bank's terminus isn't too high, according to Art Hogan of National Securities.
“If they were to raise rates six times over the next 24 months, we'd get to 1.75% or 2%, that range. That's a very normal fed funds rate,” said Hogan, the firm's chief market strategist. “It's the path to get there that causes the most concern until it starts, and then you see that the sky doesn't fall because they're raising 25 basis points a quarter for the next eight quarters or whatever their cadence happens to be.”
Anticipation of a more-aggressive Fed has especially rattled richly valued technology shares. Yields on two-year Treasuries -- the tenor most sensitive to expected Fed moves -- soared in January, sending the Nasdaq 100 to its worst month since December 2018. However, similar to the S&P 500, the tech-heavy benchmark went on to stage its best two-day rally since November 2020 as dip buyers emerged.
Monday's surge is a blueprint for what's to come should the Fed only raise rates to 2%, according to Independent Advisor Alliance's Chris Zaccarelli. However, faced with the hottest inflation in nearly four decades, he sees policy makers having to hike beyond what markets have penciled in.
Read: Wall Street Splits Over How Far and Fast Fed Acts
“If the fed funds rate stays at 2% or below, then I think the implication for stocks are what you saw on Friday and Monday -- a big rally in risk assets,” said Zaccarelli, the firm's chief investment officer. “Unfortunately, I don't think we're going to be able to tame inflation without going above 2% on fed funds, and so I'll be surprised if we don't see significant volatility for this year and next.”
Of course, the risk remains that should price pressures accelerate, traders have plenty of room to price in a higher terminal rate. While moving aggressively at the start of the hiking cycle should mean that the Fed has to raise rates fewer times overall, that calculation is subject to this quarter's coming inflation prints, BMO analysts wrote in a note Monday.
But stock bulls can take comfort in the fact that inflation expectations have cooled in recent months. Rates on 10-year breakevens are currently trading below 2.5%, down from a peak above 2.75% in November.
Meanwhile, should the Fed hike rates back to 2%, so-called U.S. real yields -- which strip out the effects of inflation -- will still be paltry, according to iCapital's Anastasia Amoroso. That should keep money flowing to technology and growth stocks, given that bonds will likely still offer a negative rate of return. Currently, 10-year real rates clock in near minus 0.71%.
“Despite all the uncertainty about the Fed -- the Fed itself doesn't know how many rate hikes it's going to deliver -- if you take a step back and look at the level of real interest rates, you're still looking at a rate that's less than zero,” said Amoroso, chief investment strategist at iCapital. “That's going to continue to support risk appetite.”
©2022 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.