SEBI Board Meeting: Easier Appointment Norms For Public Interest Director Likely
The Securities and Exchange Board of India is likely to approve fixed annual remuneration for public interest directors on market infrastructure institutions such as exchanges and depositories at its board meeting on June 18, according to people familiar with the matter.
The proposal includes a fixed annual salary of up to Rs 30 lakh for each PID, in addition to the existing sitting fee of Rs 1 lakh per board or committee meeting attended, the people said. PIDs are only paid sitting fees and are not entitled to a fixed salary at present, they said.
The markets regulator is also proposing several steps to make it easier for professionals to take on PID roles. These include reducing the amount of documentation needed during the appointment process, allowing fixed stipends in addition to sitting fees, and shortening the "cooling-off" period required before someone can be appointed as a PID.
The aim of these proposed changes is to strike a balance between maintaining regulatory oversight and giving shareholders more say in how MIIs are governed, while also encouraging a broader pool of qualified candidates to serve as Public Interest Directors.
Currently, the appointment of PIDs is handled entirely by MIIs and SEBI.
The process begins with the Nomination and Remuneration Committee of an MII selecting and evaluating at least two candidates, whose names are then passed to the board of the MII and eventually forwarded to SEBI for final approval.
Shareholders of the MIIs have no role or voting rights in this process, even though the Companies Act mandates shareholder approval for independent directors in companies.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.