India-Pakistan Tensions: A Historical Look At Nifty’s Performance During The Conflicts
Indian equity markets have historically shown resilience during periods of heightened geopolitical tensions with Pakistan. Data from past incidents suggests that while there is usually a brief sell-off following major cross-border events, markets tend to recover quickly, limiting the long-term impact on Indian equity benchmark Nifty 50.
The latest escalation followed the April 22 Pahalgam attack that killed 26. In response, India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting nine terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The airstrike has raised regional tensions, drawing investor attention to the potential impact on equities.
Short-Term Volatility, Quick Recovery
The average market corrections during past India-Pakistan conflicts have been around 7%, with a median drop of 3%, according to Anand Rathi. The brokerage expects that even in the case of further escalation, the Nifty 50 is unlikely to correct more than 5–10%, based on historical precedent and current global risk assessments.
Elara Securities reviewed nine conflict episodes since 2001 and observed a consistent two-phase pattern in market behaviour: an initial decline in the Nifty 50 followed by a recovery to pre-event levels. The volatility observed during incidents like the 2016 Uri surgical strike and the 2019 Balakot airstrike was short-lived.
Nifty's Recovery Timeline
Elara further notes that the Nifty 50 typically reaches its lowest point within six days of an attack and regains pre-conflict levels in about two days. In cases where India mounted a clear military response, the recovery was faster, often within one to five days. The index also outperformed the MSCI Emerging Markets index during those rebound phases.
While markets remain cautious amid the latest developments, past performance indicates that Indian equities have managed to absorb geopolitical shocks without sustained disruption.
Catch all the live updates on Operation SIndoor here.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.