Glenview Capital Lost $2 Billion in Assets in About Nine Months
(Bloomberg) -- Glenview Capital Management lost about $2 billion in assets in less than a year as investors fled a fund that began charging fees after it was initially free.
The hedge fund firm founded by Larry Robbins managed $7.7 billion as of March 1, according to a regulatory filing, down from $10 billion in June of last year. At its peak in 2017, the firm ran about $12 billion.
The redemptions mostly come from the GCM Equity Fund, according to people familiar with the matter, as investors move to cheaper passive products. In June, the fund opened to new investors and offered existing clients the option to exit or start paying fees. The fund, which only takes long positions, also suffered losses last year along with Glenview's flagship hedge fund.
GCM Equity, which started in November 2015, was initially offered to clients in the flagship fund for free after it lost 18 percent that year.
GCM Equity would not charge management or incentive fees until the flagship fund recouped its high-water mark, or peak value. It reached that point after gaining more than 23 percent in 2017. In June of last year, GCM Equity began charging fees of 1 percent on assets and 20 percent of profits if the fund returned at least as much as the S&P 500 Index.
In May 2018, before it began charging fees, GCM Equity had $3.3 billion in assets, the people said. It currently manages about $1.5 billion. Most of the investors who redeemed from the fund remain in other Glenview products.
GCM Equity -- which mirrors the flagship's 20 biggest positions in stocks with more than $10 billion in market capitalization -- fell 4 percent last year, the people said. In the first four months of 2019, it rose 10.4 percent, lagging the S&P 500.
Glenview's main fund is up almost 15 percent this year through April after declining more than 16 percent in 2018, the people said.
A spokesman for New York-based Glenview, which invests in equity and fixed income markets, declined to comment.
--With assistance from Saijel Kishan.
To contact the reporter on this story: Hema Parmar in New York at hparmar6@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Margaret Collins at mcollins45@bloomberg.net, Vincent Bielski, Alan Mirabella
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.