Zee-Sony Merger: Non-Compete Arrangement Made To Evade Tax, Defraud Creditors, Says JC Flowers
JC Flowers and Co., an Essel Group creditor, has questioned the legality of the non-compete arrangement between Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. and Culver Max International Pvt. (Sony Pictures).
As per the scheme, Essel Mauritius—an Essel Group entity—will receive a non-compete fee of Rs 1,100 crore from Sony Group entity SPE Mauritius.
This fee is an amount that should legally accrue to Subash Chandra, as he is the one who is giving up his right to compete, JC Flowers told the Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal.
By redirecting the amount to a Mauritius entity, in which Chandra, by admission, holds no stake, Zee is trying to ring-fence the income, senior advocate Ravi Kadam said, while arguing for JC Flowers.
As per the income tax law, any income received or receivable for giving up a right to compete is taxable. The arrangement proposed in the scheme ensures that no tax is payable in India. This is an attempt at tax evasion. —Ravi Kadam, counsel for JC Flowers
JC Flowers argued against Zee's contention that it has no locus standi to object to the scheme. Yes Bank Ltd. had extended a loan of Rs 377 crore to Essel Infra Projects Ltd, which was later assigned to JC Flowers.
Kadam highlighted that Yes Bank's no objection certificate to the scheme is only in respect to certain car loans advanced to Zee and not for loans to Essel Infra. "JC Flowers has not lost his right to sue by virtue of Yes Bank's non-objection," he said.
The loans assigned to JC Flowers were guaranteed by Chandra, Kadam informed the NCLT.
But by giving up his right to receive the non-compete fee, Zee as well as Subash Chandra are trying to defraud the creditors of Essel Group. The money that should have been utilised for the payment of Chandra and Essel Group's loans is now redirected to some outside entity, Kadam said.
Besides JC Flowers, Axis Finance Ltd., IDBI Bank Ltd. and IMAX Co. have also approached the court objecting to the merger between Zee and Sony.
The tribunal will hear the matter next on May 11.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.