U.S. Will Test New Missile Technology After Russia Treaty Ends
(Bloomberg) -- The U.S. is planning to conduct tests soon on new missile technology that would have violated a treaty with Russia that expired Friday, senior administration officials said.
President Donald Trump announced he would withdraw the U.S. from the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in 2018 after accusing Russia of developing and deploying a weapon that violated the pact. The U.S. formally suspended its participation in February, starting a six-month clock to end the pact.
The U.S. withdrawal is official as of Friday, Secretary of State Michael Pompeo said, adding in a statement that Russia had a long history of noncompliance and “is solely responsible for the treaty's demise.” Russia's violation of the INF accord poses “significant risks” to the security of states in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which “will respond in a measured and responsible way,” according to a NATO statement Friday.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, who rejects the accusation, pulled his country out of the treaty last month in retaliation to the U.S. decision. Russia is ready with a response to the U.S. withdrawal, Vladimir Shamanov, head of the lower house of parliament's defense committee, said Friday, the Interfax news service reported.
U.S. officials said the Kremlin has already fielded weapons in Western Russia capable of hitting targets anywhere in Western Europe, in violation of the treaty. They said Russia ignored multiple warnings that it was out of compliance.
QuickTake: Why Trump and Putin Blew Up Cold War Arms Treaty
The U.S., by comparison, is years away from having a deployable intermediate-range missile, and only plans to test a conventional weapon, not a nuclear one, the officials said.
“We'll see what happens,” Trump told reporters on Thursday after he was asked about the treaty's expiration. “I will say, Russia would like to do something on a nuclear treaty, and that's OK with me.”
‘Dangerous New Era'
Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association in Washington, said in a statement Friday that Russia's failure to comply with the INF Treaty “is unacceptable and merits a strong response,” but “blowing up the INF Treaty with no substitute arms control plan in place could open the door to a dangerous new era of unconstrained military competition with Russia.”
Kimball expressed concern that Washington and Moscow may let the “New START” treaty lapse when it expires in less than two years rather than renewing it. He said there would be “no legally binding limits on the world's two largest nuclear arsenals” without that treaty,“which limits each side to no more than 1,550 deployed strategic warheads and 700 deployed strategic delivery systems.”
Trump called Putin on Wednesday but they didn't discuss the INF treaty, he said. Instead, Trump said he offered U.S. help to fight wildfires raging in Siberia.
The administration officials said the U.S. has already undertaken permitted research into weapons that would violate the INF. The Cold War-era pact signed by the U.S. and the then Soviet Union led both sides to eliminate 2,692 short- and medium-range land-based missiles in their inventories by 1991, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
Including China
The Trump administration says new or renewed nuclear arms control treaties should include China's expanding arsenal as well as U.S. and Russian weapons, a prospect China already has rejected.
“Going forward, the United States calls upon Russia and China to join us in this opportunity to deliver real security results to our nations and the entire world,” Pompeo said in a statement on Friday.
To contact the reporter on this story: Josh Wingrove in Washington at jwingrove4@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Alex Wayne at awayne3@bloomberg.net, Kevin Whitelaw, Larry Liebert
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
A New Samvat Wishlist: Inclusive Prosperity And Human Development
India has strengthened its economic foundations through infrastructure, digital access and enterprise. Its next growth chapter must deepen productivity, create better livelihoods and widen participation in prosperity.
-
Love, Sex Aur Dhokha: The Audacious Plot To Spy On Jensen Huang
A Taipei dinner, a Singapore chip buyer and a suspected Chinese asset: inside the alleged spy operation that got close to NVIDIA's Jensen Huang.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.