Trump Doorman’s Receipt of $30,000 Prompts Complaints to U.S.
(Bloomberg) -- The public-interest group Common Cause asked U.S. authorities to investigate reports that a former doorman at a building developed by the Trump Organization was paid $30,000 in 2015 to stay silent about a potentially damaging rumor regarding Donald Trump's personal life.
American Media Inc., owner of the National Enquirer, paid ex-doorman Dino Sajudin for rights to the story and never published it, the Associated Press and the New Yorker reported on Thursday. AMI Chief Executive Officer David Pecker, a Trump friend, ordered Enquirer reporters to stop investigating the story, the news service and magazine reported.
Common Cause filed complaints Thursday with the U.S. Justice Department and Federal Election Commission against Trump, his presidential campaign and AMI, claiming the Sajudin payment was an improper contribution to Trump's presidential campaign.
The group has filed similar complaints with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department regarding non-disclosure payments to two women who said they had affairs with Trump: the adult-film actress Stormy Daniels, who was paid $130,000 by Trump lawyer Michael Cohen; and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, who was paid $150,000 by AMI for exclusive rights to her story, which was never published.
Doorman's Contract
Sajudin had told the Enquirer about a rumor he heard that Trump may have fathered a child in the 1980s with an employee at Trump World Tower, a New York building his company developed near the United Nations, the AP reported. Sajudin signed a contract with AMI that subjected him to a $1 million penalty if he disclosed the payment or terms of the deal to anyone, according to the AP.
In a statement on Thursday, AMI said it had determined that the rumor wasn't true, which is why it didn't run a story. The New Yorker, citing unidentified people, said the tabloid made “a concerted effort to shut down the story.”
Cohen, the longtime Trump attorney, told the AP that he discussed Sajudin's story with the tabloid when its reporters were working on it in late 2015. Cohen told the AP that he didn't know about the payment to the ex-doorman at the time.
On April 9, FBI agents seized documents from Cohen's home, office and hotel room. Prosecutors are investigating whether Cohen violated bank fraud or campaign finance laws relating to the payments to McDougal and Daniels, the AP said. Cohen's attorney called the raids “unnecessary and inappropriate.”
Evidence Sought
Among the evidence that agents sought were communications between Cohen, Pecker and the Enquirer's top editor, the New York Times reported.
AMI said in its statement that it “categorically denies that Donald Trump or Michael Cohen had anything to do with its decision not to pursue a story about a ‘love child' that it determined was not credible. The suggestion that David Pecker has ever used company funds to ‘shut down' this or any investigation is not true.”
Dylan Howard, chief content officer of AMI, said in the statement: “Paying for information has long been a practice of the National Enquirer, and to suggest that it has only paid for, and not run, stories about any particular person is absurd. Fortunately, the First Amendment does not play politics. The fact that no other news organization has subsequently been able to validate the story after AMI released the subject from his exclusivity clause confirms the basis for our editorial decision.”
To contact the reporter on this story: David Voreacos in federal court in Newark, New Jersey, at dvoreacos@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Jeffrey D Grocott at jgrocott2@bloomberg.net, Andrew Martin, David S. Joachim
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.