SEBI’s Mercy For Stressed Asset Transactions: The Rationale And Two Unanswered Questions
Market regulator SEBI has decided to lend a helping hand to RBI in its effort to resolve the non-performing assets problem.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India on Wednesday decided to exempt acquirers of stressed assets, doing so under a Reserve Bank of India asset restructuring scheme, from the mandatory open offer requirement under SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011.
SEBI said, in a brief media statement, that relaxations from preferential issue requirements and from open offer obligations are available for lenders undertaking restructuring of listed companies in distress through the Strategic Debt Restructuring (SDR) scheme or any other such restructuring scheme under RBI guidelines.
It has been represented to SEBI that where the lenders have acquired shares and propose to divest the same to a new investor, they are facing difficulties as the new investor would need to make a mandatory open offer which would reduce the funds available for investment in the company…..it has been decided to extend the aforesaid relaxations to the new investors acquiring shares in distressed companies pursuant to such restructuring schemes.SEBI Media Statement (June 21, 2017)
SEBI's exemption is accompanied by two conditions:
- Approval by the shareholders of the companies by special resolution and,
- Acquirer's shares to be locked in for a minimum period of three years.
The Rationale
Vyapak Desai, a partner at law firm Nishith Desai Associates said the provision of a special resolution maintains the rights of public shareholders in the absence of an exit opportunity via an open offer.
Ordinarily, a shareholder resolution would not have been required for such a transaction. But since the open offer requirement is being done away with, SEBI wants to be sure that the share sale to a new investor is something that the remaining shareholders are okay with.Vyapak Desai, Partner, Nishith Desai Associates
SEBI's Takeover Regulations require that in matters of change in control or the acquisition of 25 percent or more equity, the acquirer must give existing public shareholders the opportunity to exit by tendering their shares in an open offer.
Kumar Saurabh Singh, a partner at law firm Khaitan & Co. told BloombergQuint that “shareholders should also get an opportunity to accept and approve this position as something which is in their interest”.
Also Read: SEBI Eases Takeover Regulations To Facilitate Bad Loan Resolution
The First Unanswered Question
But who are these shareholders whose approval will be necessary via a special resolution? That's unclear at this stage.
Singh pointed out that in most stressed assets cases, the lenders, by converting debt into equity, would've become the majority shareholders. If SEBI disallows these lenders from voting on the transaction on account of being a related party, the erstwhile promoters could end up with enough votes to block the transaction, he added.
Sumit Agrawal, a partner at law firm Suvan Law Advisors and former legal adviser at SEBI said that more clarity would emerge once the market regulator notifies the amendment.
As of today, there isno restriction unless there is a related party transaction. The Companies Act,2013 doesn't envisage this situation where a new investor is coming in, what'llbe the role of the promoter? SEBI's press statement doesn't answer the question atthis stage.Sumit Agrawal, Partner, Suvan Law Advisors
The Second Unanswered Question
SEBI's press statement is silent on the pricing mechanism that will apply to such stressed asset transactions. That is, can the sale of shares, by the lenders to the acquirer, be done at less than the prevailing market price? That may matter if, in anticipation of such an acquisition, there is a rise in the share price of the beleaguered company.
Or – since the conversion of a loan to equity under the Strategic Debt Restructuring scheme is determined by RBI pricing guidelines – will RBI also put down guidelines for the sale of that equity to an acquirer?
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.