Supreme Court Allows Tax Department To Reopen Probe Of Gandhis In National Herald Case
The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed the Income Tax Department to reopen tax assessment of top Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi for 2011-12 in connection with the National Herald case.
The court, however, restrained the department from implementing its order in the proceedings against Rahul, who is the Indian National Congress president, and his mother Sonia till the pendency of the matter before the court.
The court also said that it was not expressing any opinion on the merits of the pleas filed by Rahul and Sonia Gandhi in the case. The tax matter is related to the National Herald case in which the Congress leaders are also facing criminal proceedings.
A bench headed by Justice AK Sikri posted the matter for further hearing on Jan. 8.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Income Tax Department, said the court should not restrain it from implementing the assessment orders against the Gandhis and others. He said the court should hear them on the matter and pass appropriate orders.
However, the bench, which also comprised Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S Abdul Nazeer, said that due to the paucity of time, the matter could not be heard on Tuesday and it is just an interim order which should be equitable to both the parties.
It made it clear that it is not going into the merits of the case for which it requires a detailed hearing.
The Gandhis, and senior Congress leader Oscar Fernandes, have challenged the Delhi High Court's Sept. 10 verdict that dismissed their plea against the re-opening of their tax assessments for 2011-12.
The apex court on Nov. 13 had said it would hear final arguments on Dec. 4 on the matter which required “consideration”.
It had not issued formal notice on the petitions filed by Rahul, Sonia and Fernandes as the Income Tax Department was represented by its counsel. They have challenged the judgment of the high court which had given opportunity to the department to scrutinise their records.
In the last hearing, their lawyers had said the question was whether the reasons given in the notice by the department were right or not. Senior advocates Kapil Sibal, P Chidambaram and Arvind Datar have been appearing for the Congress leaders.
The income tax probe against the Congress leaders has risen from the probe into a private criminal complaint filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy before a trial court here in connection with the National Herald case, in which the trio are out on bail.
Sonia and Rahul were granted bail in the case by the trial court on Dec. 19, 2015. A tax evasion petition was also addressed to the finance minister by Swamy.
In the complaint before the trial court, Sonia, Rahul and others have been accused of conspiring to cheat and misappropriate funds by paying just Rs 50 lakh, through which Young Indian had obtained the right to recover Rs 90.25 crore Associated Journals Ltd. owed to the Congress party.
It was alleged that Young Indian, which was incorporated in November 2010 with a capital of Rs 50 lakh, had acquired almost all the shareholding of Associated Journals Ltd., which was running the National Herald newspaper.
The Income Tax Department had said the shares Rahul has in Young Indian would lead him to have an income of Rs 154 crore and not about Rs 68 lakh, as was assessed earlier. It has already issued a demand notice for Rs 249.15 crore to Young Indian for the assessment year 2011-12.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.