Rapid Brexit Ruling Is Business as Usual, Top EU Court Says
(Bloomberg) -- The European Union's highest court sought to explain its lightning speed toward issuing Monday's landmark ruling on whether the U.K. can change its mind about Brexit.
In a rare step, the EU Court of Justice issued a series of tweets seeking to put the record straight after people suggested that delivering a judgment on Monday was politically motivated. It will come the day before Parliament votes on Prime Minister Theresa May's highly criticized withdrawal agreement.
The so-called expedited procedure “allows a national court to request that its case be treated urgently in light of the special circumstances,” the EU tribunal added. “Using this procedure reduces the deadlines for the various stages and prioritizes treatment of the case within the court.”
The case was sent to Luxembourg by a Scottish court, which sought urgent guidance on whether Britain could unilaterally revoke the “Article 50” letter that started the clock ticking on Brexit.
The case only arrived at the court on Oct. 3 and since then there's been a full hearing and an advisory opinion from an advocate general. But it's not the first time the court has responded quickly in a crisis.
Back in 2001, judges ruled in just over two months in a case on foot and mouth disease. Its average time to hand down a judgment in so-called urgent preliminary cases has been between 2.2 months to 2.9 months since 2013.
To contact the reporter on this story: Stephanie Bodoni in Brussels at sbodoni@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Anthony Aarons at aaarons@bloomberg.net, Peter Chapman, Jones Hayden
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.