With Contempt Vote Looming, Barr Aides Agree to Talk to Nadler
(Bloomberg) -- Hours after House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler scheduled a vote to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress for failing to provide a fully unredacted version of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report, the Justice Department agreed to further talks to resolve the dispute.
“I am pleased that the Department of Justice has agreed to meet with my staff tomorrow —and not Wednesday afternoon, as originally proposed by DOJ,” Nadler, a New York Democrat, said in a statement on Monday night. “It remains vital that the committee obtain access to the full, unredacted report and the underlying materials.”
Nadler added, however: “At the moment, our plans to consider holding Attorney General Barr accountable for his failure to comply with our subpoena still stand.”
Nadler had set votes for Wednesday morning on a resolution and an accompanying report on the contempt resolution, the committee said in a statement released Monday morning, shortly after Barr missed a deadline set by Nadler.
“The attorney general's failure to comply with our subpoena, after extensive accommodation efforts, leaves us no choice but to initiate contempt proceedings in order to enforce the subpoena and access the full, unredacted report,” Nadler said. “If the department presents us with a good faith offer for access to the full report and the underlying evidence, I reserve the right to postpone these proceedings.”
Earlier: Barr Deflects as Democrats Say He Misled on Mueller Summary
The Justice Department earlier on Monday had asked Nadler for more time to negotiate a resolution, and a meeting on Wednesday.
"We were disappointed that the committee took initial steps this morning toward moving forward with the contempt process," according to a letter to Nadler from Stephen Boyd, head of legislative affairs for the department.
Department officials are prepared to discuss providing more lawmakers and aides access to a less-redacted version of Mueller's report, as well as whether access can be given to other materials cited in the report, Boyd said in the letter.
If the committee does vote to hold Barr in contempt, the full House of Representatives would have to vote as well. The contempt resolution would also empower House Speaker Nancy Pelosi “to take all appropriate action to enforce the subpoena.”
Nadler had made a new offer to Barr last week after the attorney general declined to comply with a subpoena for the full report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and possible obstruction of the investigation by President Donald Trump. He has asked Barr to engage in a good-faith effort to let Congress access the report.
Nadler requested that Barr allow all members of Congress and some staff to have the ability to view redacted portions of the report in a secure location and work with the Congress to get court approval to release grand jury information, which is protected by law.
Read More: After Barr's Snub, Democrats Lack Options to Compel Cooperation
Representative Doug Collins of Georgia, the top Republican on the committee, said in a statement that Nadler's subpoena of Barr would have required the attorney general to break the law by releasing protected grand jury information, and said the department has been willing to negotiate.
“Democrats have launched a proxy war smearing the attorney general when their anger actually lies with the president and the special counsel, who found neither conspiracy nor obstruction,” he said.
Last week, the Justice Department said it declined to comply with the panel's subpoena for the full, unredacted report.
“Allowing your committee to use Justice Department investigative files to re-investigate the same matters that the department has investigated and to second-guess decisions that have been made by the department would not only set a dangerous precedent, but would also have immediate negative consequences,” Boyd wrote in a letter to Nadler.
Barr also declined to appear for a scheduled hearing last week before Nadler's committee in a dispute over the format of the panel.
To contact the reporter on this story: Steven T. Dennis in Washington at sdennis17@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Kevin Whitelaw at kwhitelaw@bloomberg.net, John Harney
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.