Trump Says Don't Do It as Mueller Testimony Tentatively Set
(Bloomberg) -- Donald Trump looked to forestall perhaps the most keenly-awaited event in Washington in decades -- a Congressional hearing with Special Counsel Robert Mueller -- saying “Bob Mueller should not testify. No redos for the Dems!”
The president's comment, in a pair of Twitter postings on Sunday, came hours after a Democratic member of the House Judiciary Committee said that a “tentative date” of May 15 had been set for testimony by the former FBI director to discuss his investigation into the 2016 election.
“We hope the special counsel will appear,” Representative David Cicilline of Rhode Island, said on “Fox News Sunday.” “We think the American people have a right to hear directly from him.”
Democrats have been eager for Mueller to testify at least since last month, when his report on Russian election interference and Trump's subsequent actions to squelch the investigation became public.
An appearance by Mueller, 74, whose public utterances during the two-year investigation consisted of court filings, would promise to be a dramatic day in the nation's capital, with Democrats pushing him to expand on his inability to exonerate Trump on obstruction of justice and his differences with Attorney General William Barr over the presentation of his findings.
Cicilline said a Mueller representative has agreed to the appearance, “but obviously until the date comes, we never have an absolute guarantee.” In a later tweet, the lawmaker clarified that the committee had proposed the date “but nothing has been agreed to yet.”
The committee's chairman, Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York, had previously said he was hoping for an appearance by Mueller on that date.
Trump wondered if Democrats were “looking for a redo because they hated seeing the strong NO COLLUSION conclusion.”
“The White House has so far indicated they would not interfere with Mr. Mueller's attempt to testify,” Cicilline said during his Fox appearance -- before Trump's tweets opposing Mueller's testimony.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer responded to Trump by saying in a tweet of his own that the president first refused to be interviewed by the special counsel and “now he's trying to silence” Mueller. During the investigation, Trump provided written answers to Mueller but didn't agree to be interviewed in person.
“For a man who constantly proclaims his innocence, @realDonaldTrump is acting awfully guilty,” Schumer said, directing his comment to Trump's Twitter handle. “Mueller must testify publicly before Congress.”
Democratic Representative Adam Schiff of California, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Trump also is opposing having former White House counsel Don McGahn -- a prominent witness in Mueller's report -- appear before Congress.
“Barr's testimony alone -- designed to protect Trump -- isn't going to cut it,” Schiff said in a tweet. “They will testify. The American people deserve the truth.”
Cicilline also said that if Barr doesn't comply with the committee's demands for Mueller's report and underlying documents by the Monday 9 a.m. EDT deadline, he thinks Nadler “will ask the committee to move forward with a contempt citation.”
--With assistance from Mark Niquette.
To contact the reporter on this story: Ben Brody in Washington at btenerellabr@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Sara Forden at sforden@bloomberg.net, Ros Krasny, Virginia Van Natta
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets
-
India Is Going Abroad For Critical Minerals. But It May Take Years To Pay Off | The Reason Why
Although India's steps are in the right direction, they remain modest compared with India's growing dependence.