Loya Case: Four Judges’ Statements ‘Unimpeachable’, Maharashtra Tells Apex Court
The Maharashtra government today told the Supreme Court that the statements of four judges, who were with special CBI judge BH Loya on the day of his death were “unimpeachable”.
Loya, who was hearing the high-profile Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case, had died allegedly of cardiac arrest in Nagpur on Dec. 1, 2014 when he had gone to attend the wedding of a colleague's daughter.
“According to me, statements of four judges (J Kulkarni, J Barde, J Modak and JRR Rathi) are unimpeachable that the death of Loya was natural and unfortunate,” senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Maharashtra, told a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra. “The judges were with Loya since Nov. 29 to Dec. 1, 2014. The statements were signed by the judges. Are not they trustworthy?”
If you (the court) want to reject the statements of the judges who said that Loya's death was natural, then it has to be prima facie accepted that they were co-conspirators...Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate
Also Read: Don't Reduce Court To ‘Fish Market', Apex Court Says After Angry Exchanges In Loya Case
Referring to judgements on public interest litigations, Rohatgi said the apex court amended its rules and laid down guidelines as to who can file PILs to ensure that motivated petitions are discouraged and not entertained. Alleging that petitioners were “creating castle in the air”, Rohatgi said the PILs cannot be based on unconfirmed and “hearsay” media reports solely, and the courts should verify the credentials of such petitioners.
Rohatgi said that the petitions, including those filed by Congress leader Tehseen Poonawala and journalist BS Lone, had only relied upon unconfirmed news reports, published November last year onwards without any further detail. “Nobody, including PIL petitioners, did anything for last three years and now they have come out of slumber. They are saying that they want to protect the judiciary. However, they are standing for scandalising the judiciary,” Rohatgi said.
All the petitioners did not do anything on their own. This is just ‘cut-and-paste' job. There was nothing amiss. The state is fully satisfied. It would be appropriate to bring the curtains down.Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate
Attributing motive on the petitioners, Rohatgi said press conferences are being held because the judge concerned was hearing a criminal matter in which a political figure was then accused.
Also Read: Supreme Court Transfers Judge Loya's Death Probe Case To Itself
The judges had given the statements after Police Commissioner (Intelligence) sought permission from the High Court Chief Justice, he said. Some high court judges, including the then chief justice, had also reached the hospital, he added.
About the petition of the Bombay Lawyers Association seeking an independent probe in Loya's death, he said that the list of its members, bye laws and registration number were not attached.
Rohatgi will resume arguments on Feb. 16.
Earlier, the state government had opposed the pleas for an independent probe into Loya's death, terming them as “motivated” and based on “yellow journalism”. Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for an intervenor, had referred to sequence of events to highlight her submission that a probe was needed to rule out any foul play and alleged a trial court judge in the Sohrabuddin case was transferred in a "tearing hurry".
Current BJP President Amit Shah was an accused in the Soharabuddin Shaikh case, but was later discharged.
Also Read: A Supreme Court Changed Forever: Editorial
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.