A Democratic Proposal Would Ban Lawmakers From Trading Any Stocks at All
(Bloomberg) -- Recent investing scandals involving members of Congress have prompted two Democrat senators to push a Draconian legislative proposal: a total ban on U.S. lawmakers trading any stocks at all.
Senators Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Sherrod Brown of Ohio said the prohibition would prevent lawmakers from abusing their positions for personal gain. In a Thursday statement, they said it would address situations in which politicians have profited from buying and selling stocks in certain industries while at the same time working on legislation that impacts those industries.
As justification for the proposal, Merkley and Brown referenced two instances of alleged misconduct, both of which involved Republicans.
First they pointed to Representative Chris Collins, the New York lawmaker who won re-election in November after being indicted on insider-trading charges four months earlier. They also cited former Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price, who traded health care stocks while he was in Congress, including shares he purchased at the recommendation of Collins.
“It's way past time to end conflicted trading, in which legislators and top staff trade in stocks while making decisions affecting their value,” Merkley said in the statement. “It undermines both the integrity of governance and the perception of integrity. Let's end this corruption now.”
Collins has pleaded not guilty. Price, who resigned as HHS chief in September 2017 amid complaints that he used private jets at taxpayers' expense, has denied wrongdoing over his stock trades. Federal authorities haven't accused Price of misconduct.
The Democrats' bill would seem to face extremely long odds of winning approval in a politically divided Congress. Plus, many lawmakers might argue that Congress already toughened rules to prevent insider trading as recently as 2012 through a bill called the Stock Act.
That law made illegal for members of Congress and federal officials to trade on pending information about legislation decisions. It also requires lawmakers to publicly disclose stock transactions up to 45 days after making them -- in addition to annually revealing holdings as part off their assets and liabilities.
The bill Merkley and Brown plan to propose requires new members of Congress to sell their stock holdings within six months of being elected, while current lawmakers would have to divest shares within six months of the legislation's enactment. Lawmakers would also be prohibited from sitting on corporate boards. The legislation requires senior congressional staff members to sell their stock, as well.
If politicians don't want to sell, they could instead agree to engage in no trading as long as they're in office. Alternatively, they could transfer their stock to a blind trust. Lawmakers would still be allowed to invest in mutual funds and exchange traded funds that are made up of many companies.
--With assistance from David Goodman.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jesse Westbrook in Washington at jwestbrook1@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Jesse Westbrook at jwestbrook1@bloomberg.net, Gregory Mott
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.