Government Introduces Bill To Reduce Tenure Of Tribunal Members, Rationalise Appointments
The government recently introduced a bill in the Lok Sabha to rationalise and specify conditions regarding appointment of members in tribunals set up under various laws.
The Tribunal Reforms Bill, 2021, also aims to abolish existing tribunals set up under laws relating to cinematograph, copyright, trademark, airports authority, customs, patents and others.
It has also proposed to limit the tenure of a chairperson or member in a tribunal to four years. This is with an intent to override the apex court's judgment last year which stipulated that the minimum term must be five years. This change, according to the bill, won't apply with respect to tenure of members or chairpersons who were appointed between May 26, 2017, and a notified date that will be specified later.
The government first proposed such changes through the Finance Act, 2017, which underwent various legal challenges.
Commenting on the intention behind the bill, Sameer Jain, managing partner at PSL Advocates and Solicitors said that in the last five years, the government has been undertaking an overhauling exercise to improve the efficiency of the tribunals either through their abolition or merger on the basis of powers and functions.
Contrary to their original intent, figures from last three years have highlighted that tribunals from diverse sectors haven't necessarily led to faster justice delivery, sometimes at considerable expense to the exchequer. Reduction of ineffective tribunals will rein in the additional layer of futile litigation and address the lack of proper infrastructure and staff shortage.Sameer Jain, partner, PSL Advocates and Solicitors
Here are the key changes in various laws the bill aims to introduce.
Tenure of a member or chairperson in the following will be limited to four years:
- Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
- Securities Appellate Tribunal, Debt Recovery Tribunal and the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal.
- National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.
- National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
Cinematograph Act: A person aggrieved by a decision of the Central Board of Film Certification relating to refusal in granting a certificate or its rating can refer an appeal within 30 days to the high courts. Earlier, such appeals had to be filed in a dedicated tribunal.
Copyright Act: Disputes under the Copyright Act relating to publication of a work, assignment of copyright, compulsory or statutory licensing, license for translation, among others, will now be decided by a commercial court or a commercial division of the high court, as the case may be. The existing appellate board will be discontinued.
Patents Act: The bill proposes that any person who is aggrieved due to an error, absence, omission or entry without sufficient cause in the register of patents must now approach the high court, instead of the existing appellate tribunal.
Trademarks Act: Powers of the appellate board under this law, for cancellation or variation in the register of trademarks will now vest with the high court. Similar change applies to appeals against the decision of trademark registrar.
The bill also lays down the conditions for constitution of a search and selection committee for appointment in tribunals, which must be chaired by the Chief Justice of India or a Supreme Court judge.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets
-
India Is Going Abroad For Critical Minerals. But It May Take Years To Pay Off | The Reason Why
Although India's steps are in the right direction, they remain modest compared with India's growing dependence.