Democrats Challenge Trump’s Pick to Oversee Pandemic Funds
(Bloomberg) -- Senate Democrats challenged a vow of “fairness and impartiality” by Brian Miller, President Donald Trump's nominee to oversee trillions of dollars being spent in the effort to rescue the economy from the coronavirus pandemic.
“President Trump has shown outright hostility to anyone who has tried to hold him accountable to the American people,” Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown, the top Democrat on Senate Banking Committee, said at Miller's confirmation hearing on Tuesday. He said Miller needs to demonstrate he can take on the White House and “any other bad actor.”
Democrats have questioned Miller's ability to serve as Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery, or SIGPR, in light of his current post -- as a White House lawyer who participated in Trump's impeachment defense.
Miller said he's shown his independence in his past career, including through aggressive investigations as inspector general at the General Services Administration during President George W. Bush's administration that brought calls for his resignation.
“If the president removes me, he removes me,” Miller said of the new post. “If I am unable to do my job, I will resign.”
Discussing the pandemic funds, he said, “It's vital that this money goes to the small businesses and hard-working Americans that need the money right now. We can't afford to have it diverted to fraud, waste and abuse.”
Pressed by Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Miller said he would investigate corporations that take bailout funds and then lay off workers and would “investigate all potential conflicts of interest” including lobbying of the White House and Congress.
Miller repeatedly cited “White House confidentiality” in declining to comment on moves such as Trump's firing of Michael Atkinson, the intelligence community inspector general, who the president called “a disgrace.”
Social Distancing
The hearing was held under new social distancing protocols, with Brown and most other senators asking their questions over video connections, while committee Chairman Mike Crapo, an Idaho Republican, and Miller spoke through face masks in an almost empty committee room.
Earlier: Watchdogs Eye Trillions in Virus Aid While Leashes Are Kept Taut
Created by the $2.2 trillion Cares Act that Congress passed in March, the SIGPR's purview will be key stimulus programs including $454 billion in backstops to lending programs through the U.S. Federal Reserve, as well as money for airlines and defense companies. The central bank is leveraging funds from the Treasury Department into trillions of dollars in liquidity for the economy.
Miller said he expects to start with a staff of 75 to 100 people, saying “it will be hard to staff up quickly.”
It's unclear how deep Miller will be permitted to probe if, as expected, he wins confirmation in the Republican-led Senate. Trump already has sought to rein in the post Miller would fill by limited its communications with Congress.
The president also has moved in recent weeks to strip power from inspectors general he views as disloyal. He dismissed one watchdog, criticized another for spotlighting reports of equipment shortages at hospitals and shunted another from a post overseeing pandemic spending beyond the Treasury Department.
“We need a strong, tough IG,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a speech Tuesday. “Billions of dollars are being spent. We don't want someone who has in his mind ‘I've got to please the president.'”
Related: Fed Rebuked Over Loan Terms That Don't Explicitly Bar Layoffs
The SIGPR will operate inside of the Treasury to oversee Secretary Steven Mnuchin's work, with an operating budget of about $25 million over five years, and is supposed to submit quarterly reports to Congress.
Miller said that the SIGPR office should oversee all crisis spending by Treasury and also by the Fede. Mnuchin has so far pledged about 40% of the $454 billion of funds Congress authorized to the Fed, through which the central bank can leverage more than $2 trillion in lending.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.