Brazil's Ex-Royals Lose 123-Year Legal Dispute Over Rio Palace
(Bloomberg) -- After a 123-year legal dispute, Brazil's Superior Court of Justice ruled unanimously that the Guanabara Palace in Rio de Janeiro belongs to the state, and not the heirs of the country's former royal family.
A press spokesman for the court confirmed that the judges had voted unanimously against two appeals lodged by descendants of Brazil's last emperor, Dom Pedro II, seeking the return of the property or compensation for its seizure by the state. A lawyer for the former imperial family said they would consider appealing the decision at the Supreme Court, according to the G1 website.
Princess Isabel, the daughter of Dom Pedro II, first filed a claim for the palace in 1895, six years after her father was overthrown by the military, bringing to an end the only monarchy in South America. The former emperor spent the last few years of his life living frugally in Europe, dying in a modest hotel room in Paris. Lawyers for the state argued that the property, currently used as the seat of the Rio de Janeiro state government, was paid for by the nation and belonged to its people.
"The end of the monarchy brought to end the use of this property as a residence for the royal family," Judge Antonio Carlos Ferreira said. "There's no more to say about princes and princesses."
In a 1993 plebiscite on the country's preferred form of government, over 13 percent of Brazilians voted for a return of the monarchy.
To contact the reporter on this story: Bruce Douglas in Brasilia Newsroom at bdouglas24@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Vivianne Rodrigues at vrodrigues3@bloomberg.net
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.