Compensation To States Remains Unfinished Business For The GST Council
The seventh GST Council meet saw the Centre and the states agree on the compensation law detailing that the Centre will absorb any spillover of revenue losses accruing on account of the adoption of the new indirect tax regime.
But hurdles in the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax are far from over. Inter-state trade, dual control and the quantum of compensation remain unresolved issues, according to West Bengal Finance Minister, Amit Mitra.
Compensation Back On The Table
The earlier three-day discussion on compensation had taken place before the demonetisation decision was announced. It was estimated, given only a few large states would need compensation, that in the first year the Centre would pay states Rs 55,000 crore raised through the levy of cesses. But now, after the demonetisation or invalidation of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes and the ensuing cash crunch, states expect tax revenues will be hit by 30 - 40 percent and hence the compensation amount needs revisiting, said Mitra. He expects the compensation amount to increase to Rs 70,000 - 80,000 crore in the first year.
According to discussions at earlier meetings of the GST Council, the Centre will impose a cess on luxury items like high-end cars and demerit goods including tobacco, pan masala and aerated drinks, over and above the highest tax slab of 28 percent. These cesses would add up to Rs 55,000 crore, and it was decided that this amount would be used to compensate states for their revenue collection shortfall.
Mitra said, with the quantum of compensation set to rise, the Centre must look at additional routes to fund it, such as the Consolidated Fund of India, and the matter will therefore come back to the Council for further discussion.
There is a serious issue today. If Rs 55,000 crore was not enough, where will the remaining amount of money come from? The unanimous formulation was Rs 55,000 crore, every source was defined...and today that whole thing is out of the window.Amit Mitra, West Bengal Finance Minister
Indirect tax expert Amit Sarkar said while the states will forego a large chunk of the tax collection once GST is rolled out, the implementation of the indirect tax regime will increase the total collection.
“If there is a request for higher compensation due to the adverse effect of demonetisation in the economy, it is important to note that it is the very same economy where the central government itself would be collecting taxes. So, the question arises where will that money come from?” Sarkar said.
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said that the compensation due to the states will be paid every two months.
The compensation law, which was cleared on Friday, states that the Centre would compensate states for five years if they incur losses post the implementation of GST. The revenue growth rate that would be considered to arrive at the compensation amount would be 14 percent, and the base year would be kept as 2015-16.
Cross Empowerment
The contentious issue of cross empowerment which is a part of the Integrated GST will be taken up for discussion in the GST Council's next meeting on January 3 and 4.
The Centre and the states are yet to arrive at a consensus on the division between the two authorities. States have maintained their demand for exclusive control over assessees with a turnover up to Rs 1.5 crore, but the Centre is yet to concede.
The Centre has also said that while empowering the states, it cannot afford to disempower itself by giving the states exclusive control over such assessees.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets
-
India Is Going Abroad For Critical Minerals. But It May Take Years To Pay Off | The Reason Why
Although India's steps are in the right direction, they remain modest compared with India's growing dependence.