Virus Adds to Asia’s Push to Lure Investment Away From China
(Bloomberg) -- Economic ties between the U.S. and China have been under increasing strain the last few years. The trade war, more scrutiny and controls on investment, national-security concerns and now the pandemic have all been factors in calls for a decoupling between the two largest economies.
Those issues are also having an effect on investment and trade between China and its Asian neighbors, with a number looking to take advantage of the trade war to attract investment, or to deliberately steer their supply chains away from China.
The U.S. was only the sixth-largest source of direct investment for China in the first 10 months of 2019; what Taiwanese, Japanese, or South Korean companies and governments do is just as consequential for how global investment and supply chains are configured.
Taiwan
Taiwan's government has been looking to bring back at least some of its companies back from the mainland, and the success of such programs is one of the reasons its economy outperformed South Korea and other peers last year. In 2019, Taiwanese firms realized NT$217 billion ($7.3 billion) from China under one incentive program to invest at home.
As of the end of April, Taiwanese firms -- which have invested in China for more than two years and have been hit byu the trade war -- have promised to invest NT$752 billion, according to a government report this month, with that program and the trade war likely contributing to the slump in investment flowing to the mainland last year.
Japan
Japan is another nation which is now looking to encourage its companies to move from China, setting aside $2.3 billion of its pandemic stimulus package to help firms move supply chains back to Japan or elsewhere.
“Considering the concerns about the effect on Japan's supply chains of a decrease in the supply of goods from China and elsewhere, for high-value added goods which are reliant on output in just one nation, we plan to bring production back to Japan,” Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said on March 5. “For other goods, we shouldn't rely on just one nation, but diversify production to the countries of Asean and elsewhere.”
Although the budget has only just been passed and firms will likely wait to see how the record economic downturn affects the domestic economy, at least one company has already moved to increase domestic production.
Iris Ohyama Inc., a privately-held company making household goods, announced in late March that it would start domestic production of face masks. While the company already has two factories in China making masks, it said that rising demand and the increased risks of overseas production meant it would start production in Japan from next month.
India and Vietnam
As well as investor nations trying to bring firms back or at least diversify from China, other countries are trying to attract some of that money.
Vietnam was already a favored location for foreign investors looking for an alternative manufacturing hub to China following escalating trade tensions with the U.S. Now, India is looking to businesses moving out of China with an offer of land almost double the size of Luxembourg, Bloomberg reported this week.
However, China is still an attractive destination for many foreign companies, especially those that sell to Chinese consumers. The mainland is now the largest car market in the world, and even though sales have fallen for more than a year, it's highly unlikely companies like Toyota Motor Corp. or Hyundai Motor Co. would move production out of the country.
Other international firms are increasing their investment in the country, with Samsung Electronics Co. investing $8 billion in a second plant to make memory chips in Xi'an, China, after a $7 billion investment in 2017, according to the city government late last year. And Tesla Inc. is already selling cars from its new multi-billion-dollar factory in Shanghai.
Even some U.S. firms are still keen to beef up their presence. In a survey in December 2019, before the virus outbreak, about 20% of U.S. companies in China said that investing there was there first priority, and almost 40% ranked it as a top-three priority, according to a Chamber of Commerce survey.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.
With assistance from Bloomberg
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.