US Tariff Impact: Trump's 50% Levy Shoots Down Close To 100 Tanneries In Tamil Nadu, Says Report
India's leather and non leather footwear exports amounted to $4.4 billion between 2024-2025, out of which, $1 billion worth of exports were directed to the United States, but the sub-continent seems to be losing its domain to other countries such as Vietnam, China, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Mexico, according to a TOI report.
This sudden turning of tides can be attributed to none other than the 50% tariffs slapped on India by the Trump administration. The impact of these punitive measures has been felt deeply by the tanneries in the Ambur region of Tamil Nadu's Periyavarigam village, where a minimum of 50 factories have been shut.
Half of Tamil Nadu's leather exports are directed towards the US. Besides Tamil Nadu, Agra and Kanpur were the epicentre for manufacturing of leather goods, making up 70% of Indian exports to Washington. Exported goods mainly consisted of belts, bags, shoes and wallets.
Senthil Murugan, a technical expert for the leather goods market and a supplier of raw materials informed TOI that factories supply leather goods to Europe, which imposes 20% tariffs, are still functional, but most of those exporting to the US have shut shop, with shoemakers shifting to alternate materials. He added that some of the tanneries are shifting their operations entirely to other locations where tariffs are lower, like Vietnam and Bangladesh.
Quest For A Solution
US buyers are urging New Delhi to either offer big discounts on leather goods or cut down on orders. While some factories have begun venturing into other markets, such as the United Kingdom; for many, no solutions seems to be on the horizon.
Discussions with Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has borne little fruit for the Council for Leather Exports and the Federation of Indian Export Organisations or FIEO.
The FIEO has requested an interest equalisation scheme, stronger market access initiatives, and temporary aid for exports to the US to prevent job losses, citing punitive tariffs and statutory contributions.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.