UN Climate Conference Features Meat (and Emissions) Heavy Menu
(Bloomberg) -- “Eat less meat” has become a mantra of climate change activists, but there's plenty of meat on the menu at the COP24.
The 22,000 delegates attending the 24th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change this week in Katowice, Poland will attempt to hammer out specific rules to hold signatories to emissions-reducing pledges made in Paris two years ago. But three nonprofits are noting that the conference's menu, which features more meat and dairy than plant-based options, sends an unfortunate if perhaps unintended message from a group whose focus is to slow the Earth's march toward calamity.
The UN's Food and Agriculture Organization has estimated that 14.5% of global emissions come from livestock alone. Eliminating those emissions would go a long way towards meeting emissions goals, animal welfare and environmental activists argue. Slowly but surely, changes to diet are being seen as an important piece of climate change mitigation plans.
In the span of one week in October, for example, three major climate change reports all called for less meat and dairy heavy diets. First, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated with “high confidence” that changing dietary behaviors could be an effective mitigation strategy. Then, a study in Nature called for major reductions in the consumption of meat and dairy, with nuts, legumes, fruits and vegetables subbing in. Finally, a plan presented by the Climate, Land, Ambition & Rights Alliance found global temperatures could be kept from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) by limiting individual meat consumption to about two five-ounce servings per week.
Such a radical shift in the human diet would fundamentally alter the way food is produced, and help tackle other issues such as biodiversity loss, violations of indigenous rights, and food insecurity, the group contends.
At COP24, however, attendees will be offered cheeseburgers, gnocchi with parmesan and Parma ham, and beef with smoked bacon, notes the Center for Biological Diversity, Farm Forward and Brighter Green. In their analysis, the menu from the 12-day conference could emit about the same amount of greenhouse gases as burning 500,000 gallons of gasoline, if all the attendees chose meat-based dishes at the site's largest food court.
Along with sessions on energy, finance and oceans, the COP24 agenda also includes an event on Wednesday titled “Planetary Health: Food Systems Event,” organized by EAT, the UN Climate Change secretariat's Momentum for Change initiative and The Rockefeller Foundation. It “aims to raise awareness of the role of food systems in addressing both climate change and the sustainable development goals,” according to the event's website.
“The menu on offer appears to completely ignore the climate,” said Fabrice DeClerck, Science Director at EAT, in an emailed statement to Bloomberg. Reducing meat consumption, he continued, is "the single biggest food system change that can be made in support of climate."
“The meat-laden menu at COP24 is an insult to the work of the conference,” said Stephanie Feldstein, director of the Population and Sustainability program at the Center for Biological Diversity, in a press release. “If the world leaders gathering in Poland hope to address the climate crisis, they need to tackle overconsumption of meat and dairy, starting with what's on their own plates.”
Representatives from COP24 and the Rockefeller Foundation did not immediately respond with a comment.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Joshua Petri at jpetri4@bloomberg.net
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.