Trump Hails Steel Tariffs in Defiance of GOP Request to End Them
(Bloomberg) -- Republican senators said they warned President Donald Trump Thursday against imposing tariffs on auto imports and discussed alternatives that would achieve the White House's goals.
Trump followed with a tweet celebrating his current steel tariffs.
More than perhaps any other issue, trade is where Trump has broken with Republican free-market orthodoxy. GOP Senators used a Thursday meeting at the White House to voice their economic and political concerns with Trump's steel and aluminum tariffs, the ongoing trade conflict with China and new tariffs the president has threatened to impose on auto imports.
The Republican senators, led by Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa, said they emphasized the urgency of approving Trump's new North American trade deal, known as the USMCA, as well as the importance of removing existing tariffs and avoiding new ones. Grassley said he “urged President Trump to work with us get past the steel and aluminum tariffs issue so USMCA can become law.”
The appeal appears to have had little success, as Trump followed the meeting with a Twitter post declaring that “Tariffs are working” for Pennsylvania, one of the swing states that helped lead him to electoral victory in 2016.
The Trump administration has studied auto tariffs, using the same national security justifications cited for the steel and aluminum tariffs. A spokeswoman for Senator Johnny Isakson of Georgia, said he warned Trump “that moving forward with tariffs on foreign automobiles will hurt the American economy, and Georgia companies will be forced to decrease capacity and delay planned expansion if tariffs are imposed.”
Harmful Tariffs
“It was a productive meeting where ideas were discussed on ways to accomplish the administration's goals without imposing harmful tariffs that will hamper the U.S. economy,” the spokeswoman added.
Trump in February received the findings of an investigation by the U.S. Commerce Department into whether there was a national security threat from auto imports, which could lead to tariffs on imported cars and their parts.
Trump has until May 18 to decide whether to act on any of the recommendations in the report, or he can delay a decision. The president has threatened to slap a 25 percent duty on cars coming from the European Union, though last year he agreed to delay that action while the two sides negotiated.
Trump administration officials at the meeting on Thursday included U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow, trade adviser Peter Navarro and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross.
The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement that Trump negotiated as a replacement for the North American Free Trade Agreement has yet to be approved by lawmakers in all three countries.
Earlier: Independent Report Finds Trump's New Nafta Would Hit Auto Sector
With time running out before the American presidential election next year and elections in Canada this fall, Grassley and other Republicans have been pushing the White House to remove remaining obstacles, including metals tariffs and other changes that House Democrats have demanded, before the deal can be considered for a vote.
Grassley's most pointed attack yet came in a Wall Street Journal op-ed earlier this week, where he told Trump his new trade deal is dead if he decides not to lift the metals tariffs.
He said his intention was to underscore that point with the president and his advisers.
“It's the same message I have been giving to the White House: Auto tariffs are bad and if you are going to get any sort of Mexican trade agreement, the tariffs have to go off,” Grassley said before the meeting.
“The president says it's a good agreement. If it's a good agreement, why wouldn't the president want to pass it? If we don't pass it we aren't going to have credibility for any other negotiation.”
To contact the reporters on this story: Jenny Leonard in Washington at jleonard67@bloomberg.net;Erik Wasson in Washington at ewasson@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Brendan Murray at brmurray@bloomberg.net, Anna Edgerton, John Harney
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.