Trump Drug Rebate Plan Won't See Lower List Prices, CBO Says
(Bloomberg) -- A key part of the Trump administration's plan to lower the list prices of drugs wouldn't actually do so and would end up increasing federal spending by tens of billions of dollars over a decade, the Congressional Budget Office said Thursday.
A proposal put forth by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in January would sharply curtail a complex system of drug-price rebates that pharmaceutical companies pay to pharmacy-benefit managers, or PBMs. The rebates give drugmakers' products favorable placement on list of drugs covered by health-insurance plans. Those lists can steer patients to one product over another, using co-pays or cost sharing to make preferred products cheaper.
Banning them would not have the intended effect of forcing prices down, the CBO said.
“Rather than lowering list prices, manufacturers would offer the renegotiated discounts” in another form, said the CBO, which performs budgetary and economic analysis for Congress.
The proposal would increase spending for Medicare, the U.S. health program for the elderly and disabled, by about $170 billion over 10 years. It would raise federal spending for Medicaid, the shared state-federal health program for low-income people, by about $7 billion in the same period, according to the CBO.
The Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, which represents PBMs, said the report supports what the industry has been saying all along.
“The CBO analysis confirms that the proposed rule on prescription drug rebates will not achieve the administration's stated goal of reducing prescription drug prices,” PCMA Chief Executive Officer JC Scott said in a statement.
The estimate is a blow to the Trump administration's drug-cost-reduction efforts, a goal shared by both Republicans and Democrats. Pharmacy benefit managers including those run by Cigna Corp., UnitedHealth Group Inc. and CVS Health Corp., have opposed the idea.
While rebates can be used to lower insurance premiums broadly, they have also resulted in high list prices that some patients pay when they're outside of their insurance coverage or if they don't have insurance. In January, HHS Secretary Alex Azar said that eliminating the rebates would “finally ease the burden of the sticker shock that millions of Americans experience every month for the drugs they need.”
The rise in federal costs comes from higher insurance premiums, which otherwise would have been reduced by the rebates. The proposal would also lower out-of-pocket drug costs for some Medicare beneficiaries, according to the CBO, leading to higher drug utilization.
To contact the reporter on this story: Anna Edney in Washington at aedney@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Drew Armstrong at darmstrong17@bloomberg.net, Mark Schoifet
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.