Top Earners Flocked to These Opportunity Zones Pretax Break
(Bloomberg) -- A new tax break intended to lure investors to poor areas includes many communities where high-income families had already been moving in droves, signaling developers may not have needed the extra incentive at taxpayers' expense.
More than 20 of the “opportunity zones” -- a designation created by the 2017 tax law -- have seen the concentration of $200,000-plus households increase by at least 10 percentage points since the year 2000, according to a study released Tuesday by San Francisco-based consulting firm Webster Pacific, titled “Wind at Your Back: Finding the Top 50 Opportunity Zones for Real Estate Investment.”
The paper, by Ames Lyman and Steve Bazant, said income growth correlates with rising property values and, therefore, the areas on the list are likely to see continued real estate appreciation. The No. 1 zone is in the Gowanus neighborhood of South Brooklyn, where the concentration of households earning $200,000 or more has climbed to 22 percent from almost zero at the turn of the millennium. No. 4 on the list was in Williamsburg, also part of Brooklyn.
The report identifies the zones where the concentration of households earning $200,000 or more was already growing the fastest since 2000, according to U.S. Census Bureau data adjusted for inflation. Opportunity zones are based on census tracts, which typically encompass 8,000 people or fewer, and they generally had to meet a threshold for poverty or income, or be adjacent to another qualified zone. Governors ultimately get to nominate the zones in their states as long as they meet the basic criteria.
The opportunity zone program was created as part of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and was meant to bring development dollars to areas that otherwise might have been left to languish. The lion's share of the zones are in areas of significant need. But, as critics point out, the 8,700 eligible “opportunity zones” also include a number of neighborhoods that probably would have lured investment anyway, even without the tax savings.
Investors will aim to put money where they stand to earn the greatest returns, Samantha Jacoby, a senior tax legal analyst with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in Washington, said in an interview Tuesday. “It's entirely possible, maybe even likely, that a disproportionate share of investment will go to those areas, even though a vast majority of zones are distressed.”
Among the top 50, 15 were in the New York metropolitan area. A complete list of the top 20 is replicated below.
| State | Metro Area | Tract | Households Earning $200k+ (2017) | Percentage point change (2000-2017) |
| New York | New York | 36047011900 | 21.6% | 21.3% |
| Indiana | Evansville | 18163001800 | 21.4% | 19.8% |
| Oklahoma | Oklahoma City | 40109103800 | 16.2% | 16.2% |
| New York | New York | 36047054900 | 21.7% | 16.0% |
| Dist. of Columbia | Washington | 11001003400 | 16.1% | 14.3% |
| New York | New York | 36047001500 | 17.2% | 14.0% |
| California | Los Angeles | 6037190700 | 15.7% | 13.9% |
| New York | New York | 36061013500 | 15.7% | 13.8% |
| Connecticut | Bridgeport | 9001020100 | 18.0% | 13.3% |
| California | San Francisco | 6001402800 | 15.1% | 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | 42101036900 | 12.8% | 12.8% |
| New York | New York | 36047005300 | 16.4% | 12.3% |
| Texas | Houston | 48201100000 | 26.4% | 12.1% |
| New York | New York | 36047011700 | 13.1% | 12.0% |
| Maryland | Baltimore | 24510230300 | 12.3% | 11.9% |
| California | San Jose | 6085500800 | 20.0% | 11.4% |
| Ohio | Cincinnati | 39061000900 | 11.0% | 11.0% |
| Florida | Cape Coral | 12071050103 | 15.1% | 10.9% |
| Illinois | Chicago | 17031841000 | 10.8% | 10.8% |
| New York | New York | 36047012700 | 12.9% | 10.8% |
--With assistance from Noah Buhayar.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jonathan Levin in Miami at jlevin20@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Michael J. Moore at mmoore55@bloomberg.net, Rob Urban, Josh Friedman
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.