Tesla Speeds Up! Why Aren’t You Thrilled?
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Well, it's here. Tesla Inc.'s $35,000 Model 3 went on sale Thursday afternoon in typical fashion: teased on Twitter, announced by CEO Elon Musk and a bit late (it was first unveiled just shy of three years ago).
The car has a totemic significance for the company, representing the break-out moment from luxury Silicon Valley toy to electrified wheels for the masses. I went on the website and was told the base model – with cloth seats and “basic audio” – would cost me $35,000, or just over $29,000 after federal and New York subsidies (it also said gasoline savings bring the true cost below $25,000, but come on). More than 12 years after Musk published his Secret Tesla Motors Master Plan, his “even more affordable car” has arrived.
So why did the stock drop in after-hours trading? Because this crowning moment came with more than a hint of a gamble.
Context is everything here. A month ago, Musk was telling analysts on the latest earnings call:
So, yeah, we expect to introduce the standard-range Model 3 sometime probably in the middle of this year is a rough guess.
Clearly, the timetable has accelerated. Yet how to do so profitably? On the same call, an analyst had asked what the current price differential was between a battery pack and powertrain for an electric vehicle and a regular car with an internal combustion engine. Musk estimated it was “probably on the order of $7K, but trending towards $4K or $5K.” How much of that gap has been bridged in the intervening four weeks?
A clue comes in the form of other announcements made on Thursday. Musk effectively downgraded his earlier optimism about Tesla eking out a profit in the first quarter, as expressed a month ago, to saying he didn't expect this quarter to be profitable but that the next one was likely to be.
The real bombshell, however, was the news that Tesla would switch global sales to an online-only model, with many of the company's sleek stores closing. Again, there is something radical and intriguing about this, with Tesla saying prospective customers will be able to take a car for seven days and return it if unwanted and that more servicing will happen at the customer's location, saving them the trouble of traveling to it. Jury's out on how many people will want to order a $35,000 car from their phone, but still.
And yet … more job cuts? Only a month ago, Musk boasted Tesla had opened 27 new stores and service locations. Like his original estimate of the new Model 3 appearing mid-year, this is a major pivot in the space of a few weeks (the same goes for the company's solar-power business). Meanwhile, prices across the range have been cut again.
Along with the tight capital expenditure budget, it adds to the dissonance between the narrative of unquenchable demand and growth supporting the valuation and what looks like an all-out effort to boost sales in short order and slash the cost base. Does Tesla need to cut the cost of the Model 3? Absolutely. Stripped of context, therefore, Thursday's announcement ought to be a victory lap of sorts. Yet it comes, suddenly, just ahead of a $920 million convertible-bond payment and at the end of a couple of weeks that have reiterated the peculiar risks attached to the company and its CEO. All the noise and vibration is killing the thrill.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Gongloff at mgongloff1@bloomberg.net
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Liam Denning is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy, mining and commodities. He previously was editor of the Wall Street Journal's Heard on the Street column and wrote for the Financial Times' Lex column. He was also an investment banker.
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.