Shell Changes Stance on Carbon as Investors Push for Disclosures
(Bloomberg) -- Royal Dutch Shell Plc's decision to give more details on its emission-reduction plans sheds light on private discussions between the oil major and its shareholders, which led to a change in stance following years of resistance.
The capitulation will see the Anglo-Dutch company set carbon-output targets annually for the following three or five years as it works to halve its “net carbon footprint” by 2050. The goals will be tied to executive pay.
Shell will start setting targets in 2020, it said in a statement that -- unusually -- was co-signed by some of its largest investors. Most conversations about climate between oil majors and shareholders are held behind closed doors, making it hard for outsiders to know if they're adequately tackling the issue.
“This joint statement is the first of its kind,” said Adam Matthews, director of ethics and engagement for the Church of England Pensions Board, which helped lead shareholder talks with Shell. It “gives us the confidence that Shell is committed to this path.”
The oil company also said it will review its work with trade associations to ensure it's not financially supporting groups that could undermine its climate goals. It will publish the results of that review in the first quarter.
Carbon Footprint
Shell last year announced long-term targets for reducing its net carbon footprint, which includes emissions from its oil and gas extraction as well as from the subsequent burning of the fuels by customers. Some competitors are also cutting their footprint, but mostly limit that work to their own operations.
In the past, Shell Chief Executive Officer Ben van Beurden has resisted calls for more detail on carbon-reduction plans, saying they can be fodder for lawsuits. For three years in a row, managers have successfully urged shareholders to reject resolutions from an investor group called Follow This, which wants the company to show clearly how it will align itself with the Paris climate accord.
Read about this week's global climate summit in Katowice, Poland
The Church of England supported Follow This's filing earlier this year, which was voted down by 95 percent of Shell stockholders. That seemed like a definitive defeat, but Matthews said the Church was still intensely engaging the company behind the scenes. Over the past few months, those discussions crystallized into the request to set short-term climate targets.
In addition to the Church of England, Robeco, the Universities Superannuation Scheme and the Environment Agency Pension Fund have been among the most active participants in those talks, according to Matthews. Monday's announcement was also co-signed by other members of an investor initiative called Climate 100+, including insurer Legal & General Group Plc, which owns 1.8 percent of Shell's B shares, and UBS Group AG.
“We hope that other companies will follow Shell,” Corien Wortmann-Kool, chair of pension fund ABP, said in a statement. “That Shell has now embedded its ambition in its remuneration policy offers confidence.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Kelly Gilblom in London at kgilblom@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: James Herron at jherron9@bloomberg.net, Amanda Jordan, Rakteem Katakey
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.