Russian Oil Magnate Who Sued Rothschild for Fraud Sees N.Y. Case Tossed
(Bloomberg) -- A former Russian oil magnate's lawsuit to recover half of his lost $150 million fortune from the Edmond de Rothschild bank was dismissed by a judge in New York.
State Supreme Court Justice Joel Cohen on Thursday ruled that the U.S. was the wrong forum for the case, because most of the evidence, defendants and transactions were overseas.
Read More: Lost Fortune Pits Rich Russian Against Rothschild in N.Y. Court
Sergey Bogdanchikov, who rose from the son of a schoolteacher and a farm mechanic on the Russian steppe to lead the energy giant Rosneft at one time, filed the case in New York last year. He claimed that the bank's Luxembourg unit conspired with a Brighton Beach couple and a Manhattan investment manager to siphon off his fortune through inflated fees and kickbacks while hiding behind “the luster and reputation” of the Rothschild name. Hovering over the case was the allure of Swiss banks as the world's safest repositories of wealth.
Dismissal of the New York claims against the Brighton Beach couple requires them to make a filing within 14 days to show they accept the jurisdiction of the Luxembourg courts for Bogdanchikov's case against them there, the judge said. If not, the case can resume in New York, he said.
The ruling means the couple is “now obliged to face justice in Luxembourg,” Alexey Bogdanchikov, Sergey's son, and a spokesman for him, said in a statement, adding: “We will continue to seek full compensation from Bank Edmond de Rothschild despite this court ruling on technical grounds.”
The bank has denied wrongdoing, and on Thursday a Rothschild spokeswoman in Geneva declined to comment on the case's dismissal. A lawyer for the couple has also denied wrongdoing, and declined to comment on Cohen's ruling Thursday. The investment manager settled with Bogdanchikov in September.
The case is Fortinvest Investments Holding S.A. v. Vladimir Oblonsky et al., 655263/2020, New York State Supreme Court, County of New York (Manhattan).
©2021 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Ten Things I Learnt This Samvat
Patience can be a trap. Cheap stocks can stay cheap. Leverage can wipe you out. What did Samvat 2082 teach us? Niraj Shah writes on 10 lessons from the year gone by.
-
Talking Points This Week: Tech Nerves, FII Buying, And A Faraway Banking Shock
The global markets are not shining this Diwali. The exception in the large markets is, India.
-
Midterm Rally Lasted A Day. The Hard Reality Of A Divided US May Last Two Years | Opinion
Between a contested AI boom, a debt ceiling that arrives in 2027 and a president with every incentive to act alone, the next two years may prove more volatile than the first day's rally suggests.
-
Blue Wave Will Derail the AI Trade but Won't Dismantle the AI Era | Unhedged Position
The Democrats' sweep of the US Congress will see politics collide with economic forces both over the long and short term.
-
It's Time To Take The GST Council's Bet On Trust Global
Payment records can prove India's services exports, and clear, proportionate rules can bring foreign digital sellers into the tax net.
-
Opinion | India at 38: From Innovation Overperformer to Innovation Powerhouse
India now has 453 VC-backed deep science startups, 18 of them late-stage, after 117 percent growth since 2020. Laurus Labs, at USD 9.3 billion, is the most valuable deep science company in any middle-income economy outside China.
-
Navigating Energy Crossroads: S Jaishankar's Call For Diversified Supply Chains At G20 Ministerial Meeting
As geopolitical fault lines continue to test maritime trade routes and commodity flows, Jaishankar's message remains pertinent: true economic resilience requires open markets, protected transit lines, and a genuine commitment to multilateral cooperation rather than coercion.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.